A PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TRAINED MULTILAYER PERCEPTRONS AND TRAINED CLASSIFICATION TREES

被引:59
作者
ATLAS, L
COLE, R
MUTHUSAMY, Y
LIPPMAN, A
CONNOR, J
PARK, D
ELSHARKAWI, M
MARKS, RJ
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH OCEANOG,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[2] OREGON GRAD CTR,DEPT COMP SCI & ENGN,BEAVERTON,OR 97006
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1109/5.58347
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Multilayer Perceptions and trained classification trees are two very different techniques which have recently become popular. Given enough data and time, both methods are capable of performing arbitrary nonlinear classification. We first consider the important differences between multilayer Perceptrons and classification trees and conclude that there is not enough theoretical basis for the clear-cut superiority of one technique over the other. For this reason, we performed a number of empirical tests on three real-world problems in power system load forecasting, power system security prediction, and speaker-independent vowel recognition. In all cases, even for piecewise-linear trees, the multilayer Perceptron performed as well as or better than the trained classification trees. © 1990, IEEE
引用
收藏
页码:1614 / 1619
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1972, COMPUTER ORIENTED AP
[2]  
Arkadev A., 1966, COMPUTERS PATTERN RE
[3]  
BARNARD PE, 1989, JUN P INT JOINT C NE
[4]  
Breiman L, 2017, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, P368, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[5]  
Duda R. O., 1973, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI, V3
[6]  
FISHER W, 1986, FEB P DARPA SPEECH R, P993
[7]   PROJECTION PURSUIT DENSITY-ESTIMATION [J].
FRIEDMAN, JH ;
STUETZLE, W ;
SCHROEDER, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 79 (387) :599-608
[8]  
LAMEL L, 1986, FEB P DARPA SPEECH R, P100
[9]  
McCulloch Warren S., 1943, BULL MATH BIOPHYS, V5, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF02478259
[10]   PARTITIONING ALGORITHM WITH APPLICATION IN PATTERN CLASSIFICATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF DECISION TREES [J].
MEISEL, WS ;
MICHALOPOULOS, DA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 1973, C 22 (01) :93-103