TEACHING HUMANISTIC AND PSYCHOSOCIAL-ASPECTS OF CARE - CURRENT PRACTICES AND ATTITUDES

被引:25
作者
MERKEL, WT
MARGOLIS, RB
SMITH, RC
机构
[1] the St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
[2] Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Mithigan
关键词
education; humanism; internal medicine; psychosocial; residency; training;
D O I
10.1007/BF02602307
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To assess current practices and attitudes toward teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care in internal medicine residency programs. Design and participants: Survey questionnaires were sent to residency directors at all 434 internal medicine residency programs accredited in 1985-1986. Response rate for two mailings was 71%. Measurements and main results: 78% of residency directors and 70% of department chairpersons bad high or moderately high levels of commitment to teaching bumanistic/psychosocial aspects of care, but only 44% of responding programs offered mandatory training, and only 18% offered elective training in these areas. Obstacles to expanded teaching of the bumanistic/psychosocial aspects rated high or moderately high by residency directors included insufficient curriculum time (51%), lack of trained faculty (44%), and pressures to reduce both training costs (40%) and patient-care costs (37%). Conclusions: Most of the training that does occur in the humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care probably happens informally via mentoring and role modeling. Appeals to expand teaching in these areas raise questions regarding what to include in medical training and the proper scope of internal medicine. Sustainable change will depend on the politics of resource distribution and the influence of general internal medicine and primary care on traditional training. © 1987 Society of General Internal Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Culliton B.J., Medical education under fire, Science, 236, pp. 419-20, (1984)
[2]  
Engel G.L., The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 310, pp. 169-81, (1978)
[3]  
Karpf M., Levey G.S., Divisions of general internal medicine: accomplishments and needs, Ann Intern Med, 103, pp. 456-7, (1985)
[4]  
Regier D.A., Goldberg I.D., Taube C.A., The de facto U.S. mental health services system, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 35, pp. 685-93, (1978)
[5]  
Thompson T.L., Psychiatry in primary care medicine, pp. 1-10, (1985)
[6]  
Thompson T.L., Thomas, Teaching psychiatry to primary care internists, Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 7, pp. 210-3, (1985)
[7]  
Bird J., Cohen-Cole S.A., Boker J., Freeman A., Teaching psychiatry to non-psychiatrists I: the application of educational methodology, Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 5, pp. 247-53, (1983)
[8]  
Cohen-Cole S.A., Boker J., Bird J., Freeman A., Psychiatric education for primary care: a pilot study of needs of residents, J Med Educ, 57, pp. 931-6, (1982)
[9]  
Houpt J.L., Orleans C.S., George L.K., Brodie K.H., The role of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the practice of medicine, Am J Psychiatry, 137, pp. 37-47, (1980)
[10]  
Smith G.R., Monson R.A., Ray D.C., Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder: a randomized controlled study, N Engl J Med, 314, pp. 1407-13, (1986)