DEPOSITION AND RESUSPENSION OF FINE PARTICLES IN A RIVERINE DEAD ZONE

被引:36
作者
TIPPING, E
WOOF, C
CLARKE, K
机构
[1] Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Windermere Laboratory, Ambleside, Cumbria, LA22 0LP, Far Sawrey
关键词
DEAD ZONE; DEPOSITION; FINE PARTICLES; RESUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.3360070304
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Particulate matter suspended in the River Severn (Shropshire, UK) consists chiefly of clay-sized mineral particles, together with living and dead micro-organisms (algae and bacteria). Its concentration depends strongly on discharge, but the particle size distribution shows no systematic variability. For most samples, the particle volume is log-normally distributed with respect to diameter, the mean diameter being ca. 9 mum. The particles are mainly aggregates, including some with linear dimensions of the order of tens or hundreds of micrometres. Particle density depends appreciably on size, decreasing from ca. 2.5 x 10(6) g m-3 at a diameter of 2.5 mum to ca. 1.3 x 10(6) g m-3 at 20 mum. The collision efficiency factor for particle aggregation is estimated to be 0.01-0.03. At low discharge, the 'dead zone' in the River Severn at Leighton is a well defined region of stagnant water behind a gravel bar. The rate of deposition of fine particles on its bed is of the order of tens of grams per square metre per day. Resuspension requires a critical bed shear velocity of 0.03-0.04 m s-1, which occurs at main river discharges greater than about 150 m3 s-1. Under such conditions the gravel bar is underwater and the dead zone is a region of highly turbulent return flow. A simple mechanistic model of particle dynamics in the dead zone accounts reasonably well for particle accumulation rates when run with parameter values based on measured particle and hydraulic properties. Calculations with the model suggest that most of the sedimentation flux to the dead zone bed is due to particles with equivalent sphere diameters in the range 30-240 mum. Simulations indicate that deposition proceeded continuously during spring and summer, whereas repeated deposition and resuspension occurred in autumn and winter.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 277
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Carling P.A., Orr H., Glaister M.S.
[2]  
Droppo I.G., Ongley E.D., pp. 95-103, (1989)
[3]  
Droppo I.G., Ongley E.D., The state of suspended sediment in the freshwater fluvial environment: a method of analysis, Wat. Res., 26, pp. 65-72, (1992)
[4]  
Einstein H.A., Deposition of suspended particles in a gravel bed, J. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 94, pp. 1197-1205, (1968)
[5]  
Gibbs R.J., Floc stability during Coulter counter size analysis, J. Sedim. Petrol., 52, pp. 657-660, (1982)
[6]  
Gibbs R.J., Tshudy D.M., Konwar L., Martin J.M., Coagulation and transport of sediments in the Gironde estuary, Sedimentology, 36, pp. 987-999, (1989)
[7]  
Graham A.A., Siltation of stone‐surface periphyton in rivers by clay‐sized particles from low concentrations in suspension, Hydrobiologia, 199, pp. 107-115, (1990)
[8]  
Gregory J., Fundamentals of flocculation, Crit. Rev. Environ. Control, 19, pp. 185-230, (1989)
[9]  
Hjulstrom F., The morphological activity of rivers as illustrated by the River Fyris, Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, 25, pp. 221-227, (1935)
[10]  
Hjulstrom F., Transportation of detritus by moving water, Recent Marine Sediments, pp. 5-31, (1939)