EMERGENT RELATIONS IN THE FORMATION OF STIMULUS CLASSES BY PIGEONS

被引:29
作者
ZENTALL, TR [1 ]
URCUIOLI, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
关键词
CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION; BACKWARD ASSOCIATIONS; TRANSITIVE INFERENCE; TOTAL REVERSALS; FOOD; EQUIVALENCE; SYMMETRY; MONKEYS; SAMPLE; REPRESENTATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/BF03395913
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A defining feature of a stimulus class is the presence of untrained (emergent) relations among its members. Three types of emergent relations that define formal stimulus equivalence are reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. We find that pigeons can demonstrate all three types of emergent relations. Reflexivity is demonstrated by showing the transfer of identity-matching to new stimuli. Symmetry is demonstrated by showing that positive transfer results when differential food versus no food outcomes (associated with correct responding to comparison stimuli in a conditional discrimination) are substituted for conditional stimuli in a matching task. Transitivity is demonstrated when training with a simple successive hue discrimination is followed by training on a symbolic matching task involving food and no-food samples and line-orientation comparisons, and positive transfer is found when the hues are substituted for the food and no-food events. Finally, pigeons can demonstrate simultaneous evidence for symmetry and transitivity relations. For example, two samples are first associated with a common comparison in many-to-one delayed matching-to-sample. When one of those samples is then associated with a new comparison, evidence for an emergent relation between the remaining sample and the new comparison is found. Overall, the pigeon data provide strong evidence for emergent relations using procedures that result in stimulus class formation.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 810
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   TRANSITIVE INFERENCES AND MEMORY IN YOUNG CHILDREN [J].
BRYANT, PE ;
TRABASSO, T .
NATURE, 1971, 232 (5311) :456-&
[2]   SYMMETRY AND TRANSITIVITY OF CONDITIONAL RELATIONS IN MONKEYS (CEBUS-APELLA) AND PIGEONS (COLUMBA-LIVIA) [J].
DAMATO, MR ;
SALMON, DP ;
LOUKAS, E ;
TOMIE, A .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1985, 44 (01) :35-47
[3]  
DAVIS H, 1992, COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF STIMULUS CONTROL, P405
[4]   REASONING IN THE CHIMPANZEE .2. TRANSITIVE INFERENCE [J].
GILLAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1981, 7 (02) :150-164
[5]   SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL CODING OF FOOD AND NO-FOOD SAMPLES IN DELAYED MATCHING IN PIGEONS [J].
GRANT, DS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1991, 17 (02) :186-193
[6]  
Gray L., 1966, PSYCHON SCI, V4, P333
[7]   NONHUMANS HAVE NOT YET SHOWN STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE [J].
HAYES, SC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1989, 51 (03) :385-392
[8]   BACKWARD ASSOCIATIONS - DIFFERENTIAL LEARNING ABOUT STIMULI THAT FOLLOW THE PRESENCE VERSUS THE ABSENCE OF FOOD IN PIGEONS [J].
HEARST, E .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1989, 17 (03) :280-290
[9]   BACKWARD ASSOCIATIONS IN PIGEON [J].
HOGAN, DE ;
ZENTALL, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 90 (01) :3-15
[10]   ACQUISITION OF REPRESENTATION-MEDIATED CONDITIONED FOOD AVERSIONS [J].
HOLLAND, PC .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1981, 12 (01) :1-18