CYTOTOXIC EFFECTS OF RESIDUAL CHEMICALS FROM POLYMERIC BIOMATERIALS FOR ARTIFICIAL SOFT INTRAOCULAR LENSES

被引:13
作者
CHIRILA, TV
WALKER, LN
CONSTABLE, IJ
THOMPSON, DE
BARRETT, GD
机构
[1] Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Western Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CYTOTOXICITY; HUMAN CHOROIDAL FIBROBLAST CULTURE; HYDROGEL; INHIBITOR; INITIATOR; MONOMER; POLYMERIZATION; SOFT INTRAOCULAR LENS;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80245-3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Development of improved hydrogels for soft intraocular lenses, based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate monomer, requires the use of various other monomers and polymerization additives which have potential ocular toxicity. Three monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, and 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate, as well as two common inhibitors, hydroquinone and 4-methoxyphenol, were subjected to in vitro cytotoxicity assays as aqueous solutions at different concentrations. A new polymerization initiator, 2,2'-azo-bis-(2,4-dimethyl valeronitrile), was thermally decomposed in water at different concentrations and the products were also assayed for cytotoxicity. Assays were based on incubation with human choroidal fibroblasts. Cell death was evaluated by trypan blue dye exclusion, DNA synthesis inhibition, and lactate dehydrogenase tests. While methyl methacrylate and 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate were found nontoxic, the other chemicals displayed high cytotoxicity. However, when extracts of synthesized poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) specimens, differentially treated after polymerization, were subjected to the same assays it was found that toxicity from residual 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate monomer was lost during steam sterilization and storage in water because of the removal of the monomer through aqueous washing. The lack of toxicity in these specimens suggests that residual contents of inhibitor and initiator are too low to cause toxic effects on choroidal fibroblasts. It is concluded that hydrogels have low cytotoxic effects in vitro.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 162
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Dreifus M, Klenka L, Reactions of the uveal tract to synthetic hydrogel implants, Cesk Oftalmol, 15, pp. 95-101, (1959)
[2]  
Dreifus M, Wichterle O, Lim D, Intracamerular lenses made of hydrocolloid acrylates, Cesk Oftalmol, 16, pp. 154-159, (1960)
[3]  
Wichterle O, Lim D, Hydrophilic gels for biological use, Nature, 185, pp. 117-118, (1960)
[4]  
Wichterle O, Lim D, Dreifus M, The problem of contact lenses, Cesk Oftalmol, 17, pp. 70-75, (1961)
[5]  
Epstein E, History of intraocular lens implant surgery, Soft Implant Lenses in Cataract Surgery, pp. 1-10, (1986)
[6]  
Mehta KR, Sathe SN, Karyekar SD, The new soft intraocular lens implant, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 4, pp. 200-205, (1978)
[7]  
Mehta KR, Sathe SM, Karyekar SD, The soft intraocular implant, VIth Congress of the European Society of Ophthalmology
[8]  
the Cornea in Health and Disease. London, Royal Society of Medicine, pp. 859-863, (1981)
[9]  
Packard RBS, Garner A, Arnott EJ, Poly-HEMA as a material for intraocular lens implantation: a preliminary report, Br J Ophthalmol, 65, pp. 585-587, (1981)
[10]  
Popham JK, Apple DJ, Newman DA, Et al., Advantages and limitations of soft intraocular lenses: a scientific perspective, Soft Implant Lenses in Cataract Surgery, pp. 11-30, (1986)