A PATIENT-BASED SYSTEM FOR DESCRIBING AMBULATORY MEDICINE PRACTICES USING DIAGNOSIS CLUSTERS

被引:10
作者
WILLIAMS, BC
PHILBRICK, JT
BECKER, DM
MCDERMOTT, A
DAVIS, RC
BUNCHER, PC
机构
[1] Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, 48109-0376, MI
关键词
DIAGNOSIS CLUSTERS; AMBULATORY CARE; PATIENT-BASED; CLASSIFICATION; PROBLEM LISTS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02599394
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To develop a patient-based classification system to describe the clinical content of ambulatory medicine practices. Design: A system of 100 diagnosis clusters was developed based on retrospective review of computerized problem lists of patients from a university practice, and then applied to the problem lists of patients in a community practice. Chart review of a 5% random sample (n = 184) of university practice patients who had problem lists was carried out to assess the accuracy of the computerized problem lists. Setting: A university ambulatory medicine practice and a community ambulatory medicine practice. Patients/participants: For the same one-year period, all 4,490 patients seen in the university practice and all 1,294 patients seen two or more times in the community practice. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: Of the 27,634 problems listed for university patients and the 5,648 problems listed for community patients, 22,629 (82%) and 4,924 (87%), respectively, were assigned to diagnosis clusters. For the university and community practices, the mean numbers of problems per patient were 6.1 (SD 5.4) and 4.4 (SD 3.7), and the mean numbers of diagnosis clusters per patient were 4.5 (SD 3.7) and 3.6 (SD 3.0), respectively. Among the ten most common diagnosis clusters in both practices were HYPERTENSION, SYMPTOM OR SIGN, OBESITY, and DIABETES. Only 18% (SD 3%) of patient problem lists in the university practice omitted one or more chronic, important medical problems (e.g., hypertension, dementia, COPD). Conclusions: This system of diagnosis clusters effectively and efficiently described the clinical content of two types of internal medicine practices, and has important applications in medical education, epidemiology, clinical and health services research, and public policy.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Wood M., Coded classification of diseases, (1972)
[2]  
Educational objectives for certification in family medicine, (1973)
[3]  
Report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians, (1975)
[4]  
Second report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practice/Family Physicians, (1979)
[5]  
Schneeweiss R., Rosenblatt R.A., Cherkin D.C., Et al., Diagnosis clusters: a new tool for analyzing the content of ambulatory medical care, Med Care, 21, pp. 105-22, (1983)
[6]  
Rabin D.L., Spector K.K., Bush P.J., Ambulatory care in the community, Public Health Rep, 95, pp. 511-9, (1980)
[7]  
Greenlick, Determinants of medical care utilization, Health Serv Res, 3, (1968)
[8]  
Schneeweiss R., Cherkin D.C., Hart G., Et al., Diagnosis clusters adapted for ICD-9-CM and ICHPPC-2, J Fam Pract, 22, pp. 69-72, (1986)
[9]  
Rosenblatt R.A., Cherkin D.C., Schneeweiss R., Et al., The structure and content of family practice: current status and future trends, J Fam Pract, 15, pp. 681-722, (1982)
[10]  
Ellsbury K.E., Schneeweiss R., Montano D.E., Et al., Content of the model teaching unit ambulatory care training and continuity of care in six family practice residency programs, J Fam Pract, 25, pp. 273-8, (1987)