STRECKER STENT AS A BAILOUT DEVICE FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY

被引:24
作者
REIFART, N
LANGER, A
STORGER, H
SCHWARZ, F
PREUSLER, W
HOFMANN, M
机构
[1] The Red Cross Hospital, Frankfurt, Main
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8183.1992.tb00411.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Strecker stent is a balloon-mounted flexible endoprothesis of knitted tantalum wires, successfully used in peripheral arteries. In our practice stents are only implanted as a bailout device after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In 112/5,000 consecutive patients (2.2%), a dissection could not be sealed with prolonged balloon inflations and resulted in total (28%) or subtotal occlusion. A total of 127 stents (71 Schatz-Palmaz, 56 Strecker) had to be implanted. All patients were pretreated with aspirin p.o. and 20,000 U heparin IV. Before stent implantation, they received 500 mg intracoronary aspirin, 5,000 U heparin, and 500 mL Dextrane; and after implant, between 1,500 and 2,300 U/hour heparin IV overlapping a 3-month treatment with Coumadin, aspirin p.o., and Pyridamol. Results of Strecker (n = 48) versus Schatz-Palmaz (n = 64) stent: technical success (97% vs 95%); acute thrombosis (13% vs 16%); subacute thrombosis (8% vs 16%); severe bleeding (15% vs 9%); myocardial infarction (2% vs 3%); emergency CABG (6% vs 5%); in-hospital death (10% vs 6%); restenosis (42% vs 31%); and late death (6-12 months) (6% vs 3%). Conclusion: (1) The Strecker coronary stent can be easily placed even in acute takeoff and tortuous vessels. (2) In bailout situations a high incidence of early thrombotic occlusions sets limits to both stents. (3) We, therefore, recommend urgent bypass operation after stent placement in these patients when the area at risk is large.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 83
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Reifart N, Kupka J, Storger H, Et al., Akuter Gefäß‐verschluß durch perkutane transluminale Koronarangioplastie: Früh‐ und Spätergebnisse der Re‐PTCA, Z Kardiol, 80, pp. 317-321, (1991)
[2]  
Reifart N, Palausch M, Storger H, Et al., Akuter Gefäß‐verschluß durch Koronarangioplastie: Früh‐ und Spätergebnisse der Re‐PTCA, Z Kardiol, 78, (1989)
[3]  
Meier B, Coronary Angioplasty, (1988)
[4]  
Page US, Okies JE, Colburn LQ, Et al., Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A growing surgical problem, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 92, pp. 847-852, (1986)
[5]  
Satter P, Krause E, Skupin M, Mortality trends in cases of elective and emergency aorto‐coronary bypass after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 35, pp. 2-5, (1987)
[6]  
Reul GJ, Cooley DA, Hallman GL, Et al., Coronary artery bypass for unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 88, pp. 685-690, (1984)
[7]  
Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, Et al., Emergency stenting for acute occlusion following coronary balloon angioplasty, Circulation, 78, pp. 1121-1127, (1988)
[8]  
Roubin GS, Douglas JS, Lembo NJ, Et al., Intracoronary stenting for acute closure following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). (abstract), Circulation, 78, pp. 2-407, (1988)
[9]  
Schatz RA, Bairn DS, Leon M, Et al., Clinical experience with the Palmaz‐Schatz coronary stent, Circulation, 83, pp. 148-161, (1991)
[10]  
Fajadet J, Maron J, Cassagneau B, Et al., Clinical and angiographic follow‐up in patients receiving a Palmaz‐Schatz stent for prevention or treatment of abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty. (abstract), Eur Heart J, 12, (1991)