HOW TO DESIGN, VERIFY AND VALIDATE EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN SYSTEMS

被引:7
作者
GREEN, DL
DOWELL, AM
机构
[1] Rohm and Haas Company, Bristol, PA 19007
[2] Risk Analysis, Rohm and Haas Texas Inc., Houston, TX 77536
关键词
AVAILABILITY; BETA-FACTOR; COMMON CAUSE FAILURES; COVERAGE; DESIGN GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSTICS; DOCUMENTATION; EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN SYSTEM; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; FINAL ELEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERLOCKS; LOGIC SOLVER; MAINTENANCE; MODELING; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PRIMARY INTEGRITY PARAMETERS; PROBABILITY OF FAILURE ON DEMAND; QUALITATIVE; QUANTITATIVE; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY DATA; SAFETY; SENSOR; STANDARDS; SYSTEM DESIGN; TESTING; UNAVAILABILITY; VALIDATION; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/0019-0578(95)00022-R
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes one method to select equipment data and to use engineering tools to design, verify or validate Emergency Shutdown System (ESS) performance. The paper demonstrates ''how to'' in a manner that is easy to follow and understand, thus allowing users to duplicate the approach in a way that reflects their company's operating environment and needs. A hierarchy of equipment data sources is discussed as to desirability, applicability and selection. From quantitative methodologies and representative engineering tools, one is chosen and validated a simple fault tree analysis software tool. The tool is used to illustrate how to evaluate hypothetical designs to develop validated qualitative ''cookbooks'' adhering to a selected set of Primary Integrity Parameters (PIPs). Developing qualitative ''cookbooks'' can speed up the design process for the majority of ESSs. Design verification is applying the tool to the actual equipment and the configuration proposed and can be used if the ''cookbook'' PIPs do not meet the operation's needs. Validation is applying the tool to systems as installed and maintained, using actual documented equipment performance. Installed ESSs performance can be validated to support documented maintenance procedures, such as test frequencies.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 272
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Federal Register, Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals, Final Rule, (1992)
[2]  
Federal Register, Risk management plan requirements, Proposed Rule, (1993)
[3]  
Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes, (1992)
[4]  
Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries, ISA-dS84.01 (Draft 16N for Committee Ballot), (1995)
[5]  
Functional safety: Safety-related systems, Draft IEC 1508, Technical Committee No. 65: Industrial — Process Measurement and Control, Sub-Committee 65A, System Aspects, Working Groups 9 and 10, (1994)
[6]  
Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, (1989)
[7]  
Bourne, Et al., Defenses against common-mode failures in redundancy systems, A guide for management, designers and operators, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Report SRD R 196, (1981)
[8]  
PES Programmable Electronic Systems in Safety Related Applications, 2. General Technical Guidelines, (1987)
[9]  
Smith, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk, Practical Methods for Engineers, (1993)
[10]  
Goble, Evaluating Control Systems Reliability, Techniques and Applications, (1990)