IOMEPROL AND IOPAMIDOL IN CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL-GROUP COMPARISON

被引:9
作者
FATTORI, R
PIVA, R
SCHICCHI, F
PANCRAZI, A
GABRIELLI, G
MARZOCCHI, A
PIOVACCARI, G
BLANDINI, A
MAGNANI, B
机构
[1] Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Ospedale Cardiologico Lancisi, Ancona
[2] Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Ospedale Policlinico S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Via Massarenti
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVASCULAR; EFFICACY STUDY;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)90095-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
During cardiac angiography, hemodynamic alterations and surface electrocardiographic changes are common, predictable and dose-related adverse reactions to radiocontrast media. High osmolality, inadequate sodium content and local transient hypocalcemia are thought to be the main mechanisms responsible for these untoward cardiovascular effects. The purpose of this double-blind, parallel-group trial was to compare the hemodynamic and electrocardiographic responses to cardiac and selective coronary artery injection of iomeprol 400 (400 mgI/ml) and iopamidol 370 (370 mgI/ml). One-hundred consenting adult inpatients were randomised to receive iomeprol 400 (41 males, nine females; mean age, 56.6 years) or iopamidol 370 (46 males, four females; mean age, 57.6 years). Both agents produced minor and transient hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects. Following left ventriculography, iopamidol 370 produced a significantly greater increase in LVEDP than iomeprol 400 (mean increases after first and second left ventriculogram: 2.5 and 4.6 mmHg with iomeprol 400, 3.3 and 9.9 mmHg with iopamidol 370, P = 0.027). The QT-interval was more affected by iopamidol 370 than by iomeprol 400. However, post-contrast prolongation of the QT-interval was not significant with either agent, nor were there any significant T-wave, ST-segment or RR-interval changes associated with the injection of the test compounds. No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. Mild pain was complained by only one patient, while most patients reported mild to moderate sensation of heat. Image quality of the vast majority of the procedures was rated as good or excellent in both patient groups. It is concluded that both iomeprol 400 and iopamidol 370 are safe, well tolerated and effective contrast media when used for cardiac angiography. Iomeprol 400 might produce less hemodynamic disturbance than iopamidol 370. Larger trials on iomeprol in cardiac angiography are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S66
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Johnson, Lozner, Johnson, Krone, Pichard, Vetrovec, Noto, Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, Coronary arteriography 1984–1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications, Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn, 17, pp. 5-10, (1989)
[2]  
Ritchie, Nissen, Douglas, Dreifus, Gibbons, Higgins, Schelbert, Seward, Zaret, Use of nonionic or low osmolar contrast agents in cardiovascular procedures, J Am Coll Cardiol, 21, pp. 269-273, (1993)
[3]  
Hlatky, Morris, Pieper, Davidson, Schwab, Bashore, Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiography, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 4, pp. 871-877, (1990)
[4]  
Steinberg, Moore, Powe, Gopalan, Davidoff, Litt, Graziano, Brinker, Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography, N Engl J Med, 326, pp. 425-430, (1992)
[5]  
Barret, Parfrey, Vavasour, O'Dea, Kent, Stone, A comparison of nonionic low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization, New England Journal of Medicine, 326, pp. 431-436, (1992)
[6]  
Fletwood, Bettmann, Gordon, The effects of radiographic contrast media on myocardial contractility and coronary resistance osmolality ionic concentration and viscosity, INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 25, pp. 254-260, (1990)
[7]  
Newell, Higgins, Kelley, Green, Schmidt, Haigler, The influence of hyperosmolality on left ventricular contractile state: disparate effects of nonionic and ionic solutions, Invest Radiol, 15, pp. 363-370, (1980)
[8]  
Baath, Almen, Oksendal, Effect of sodium addition to nonionic contrast media on cardiac contractile force: perfusion of the isolated rabbit heart with iohexol and iopentol containing 1 to 154 mmol Na<sup>+</sup>/1 added as NaCl, Acta Radiol, 31, (1990)
[9]  
Oksendal, Holten, Baath, Jynge, Effects of low osmolar contrast media on cardiac function optimal sodium concentration for contractility, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 142, pp. 149-156, (1991)
[10]  
Murdock, Euler, Kozeny, Murdock, Loeb, Scanlon, Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography in dogs: the role of calcium-binding additives, Am J Cardiol, 54, pp. 897-901, (1984)