A GENERAL-PRACTICE BASED SURVEY OF BRONCHIAL HYPERRESPONSIVENESS AND ITS RELATION TO SYMPTOMS, SEX, AGE, ATOPY, AND SMOKING

被引:74
作者
TRIGG, CJ
BENNETT, JB
TOOLEY, M
SIBBALD, B
DSOUZA, MF
DAVIES, RJ
机构
[1] ST BARTHOLOMEWS HOSP,ACAD DEPT RESP MED,LONDON EC1A 7BE,ENGLAND
[2] CANBURY MED CTR,KINGSTON,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/thx.45.11.866
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The prevalence and associations of bronchial hyperresponsiveness were investigated in a general practice population. The sample was obtained by using every 12th patient on the practice age-sex register, replacing non-responders with corresponding age and sex matched individuals from up to two further 1 in 12 samples. The response rate was 43%; 366 patients were studied. Doubling concentrations of methacholine were given to a maximum of 32 mg/ml or until a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) occurred (provocation concentration, PC20FEV1). Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was defined arbitrarily as a PC20FEV1 of 2 mg/ml or less (or 11 μmol cumulative dose, PD20FEV1). The prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness was 23%. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was not associated with age but was more prevalent in women than men (31%:13%). It was also more common in those who had ever wheezed (39%) and in those had had an attack of rhinitis in the preceding month (45%, P < 0.1), in atopic individuals (30%), and in smokers (32%) but it was not associated with cough or dyspnoea. There was a positive correlation between PC20FEV1 and resting FEV1 (r = 0.288) and a negative correlation between PC20FEV1 and mean daily peak flow variability (r = -0.356). Stepwise binary logistic regression analysis showed significant independent effects on PC20FEV1 for mean daily peak flow variability, gender, number of positive skin test responses. resting FEV1, and mean histamine skin weak area, but no relation with smoking or mean allergen weal area. The prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsivenss was much higher than the prevalence of diagnosed asthma in the practice in 1984 (4.9%). Analysis of case notes of 169 individuals showed that those with bronchial hyperresponsiveness had not attended the practice more frequently for respiratory complaints during the previous five years.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 872
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] BARNES PJ, 1984, THORAX, V31, P51
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF HISTAMINE AND METHACHOLINE BRONCHIAL CHALLENGES USING THE DEVILBISS-646 NEBULIZER AND THE ROSENTHAL-FRENCH DOSIMETER
    BENNETT, JB
    DAVIES, RJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF THE CHEST, 1987, 81 (03): : 252 - 259
  • [3] ASTHMA AND INCREASES IN NON-ALLERGIC BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS FROM SEASONAL POLLEN EXPOSURE
    BOULET, LP
    CARTIER, A
    THOMSON, NC
    ROBERTS, RS
    DOLOVICH, J
    HARGREAVE, FE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1983, 71 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [4] BOUSHEY HA, 1980, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V121, P389
  • [5] BRITTON J, 1986, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V68, P233
  • [6] BRITTON J, 1988, EUR RESPIR J, V1, P478
  • [7] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRONCHIAL HISTAMINE REACTIVITY AND ATOPIC STATUS
    BRYANT, DH
    BURNS, MW
    [J]. CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1976, 6 (04): : 373 - 381
  • [8] DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BRONCHIAL REACTIVITY IN AN ADULT-POPULATION - RESULTS FROM A COMMUNITY STUDY
    BURNEY, PGJ
    BRITTON, JR
    CHINN, S
    TATTERSFIELD, AE
    PAPACOSTA, AO
    KELSON, MC
    ANDERSON, F
    CORFIELD, DR
    [J]. THORAX, 1987, 42 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [9] WHAT SYMPTOMS PREDICT THE BRONCHIAL RESPONSE TO HISTAMINE - EVALUATION IN A COMMUNITY SURVEY OF THE BRONCHIAL SYMPTOMS QUESTIONNAIRE (1984) OF THE-INTERNATIONAL-UNION-AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS-AND-LUNG-DISEASE
    BURNEY, PGJ
    CHINN, S
    BRITTON, JR
    TATTERSFIELD, AE
    PAPACOSTA, AO
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [10] STANDARDIZATION OF BRONCHIAL INHALATION CHALLENGE PROCEDURES
    CHAI, H
    FARR, RS
    FROEHLICH, LA
    MATHISON, DA
    MCLEAN, JA
    ROSENTHAL, RR
    SHEFFER, AL
    SPECTOR, SL
    TOWNLEY, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1975, 56 (04) : 323 - 327