EVALUATION OF TURBULENCE MODELS FOR UNSTEADY FLOWS OF AN OSCILLATING AIRFOIL

被引:65
作者
SRINIVASAN, GR
EKATERINARIS, JA
MCCROSKEY, WJ
机构
[1] NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0045-7930(95)00016-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 [计算机应用技术]; 0835 [软件工程];
摘要
Unsteady flowfields of a two-dimensional oscillating airfoil are calculated using an implicit, finite-difference, Navier-Stokes numerical scheme. Five widely used turbulence models are used with the numerical scheme to assess the accuracy and suitability of the models for simulating the retreating blade stall of helicopter rotor in forward flight. Three unsteady flow conditions corresponding to an essentially attached flow, light-stall, and deep-stall cases of an oscillating NACA 0015 wing experiment were chosen as test cases for computations. Results of unsteady airloads hysteresis curves, harmonics of unsteady pressures, and instantaneous flowfield patterns are presented. Some effects of grid density, time-step size, and numerical dissipation on the unsteady solutions relevant to the evaluation of turbulence models are examined. Comparison of unsteady airloads with experimental data show that all models tested are deficient in some sense and no single model predicts airloads consistently and in agreement with experiment for the three flow regimes. The chief findings are that the simple algebraic model based on the renormalization group theory (RNG) offers some improvement over the Baldwin-Lomax model in all flow regimes with nearly same computational cost. The one-equation models provide significant improvement over the algebraic and the half-equation models but have their own limitations. The Baldwin-Barth model overpredicts separation and underpredicts reattachment. In contrast, the Spalart-Allmaras model underpredicts separation and overpredicts reattachment.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 861
页数:29
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
BALDWIN BS, 1990, NASA TM102847
[2]
BALDWIN BS, 1991, AIAA910610 PAP
[3]
BALDWIN BS, 1978, AIAA780257 PAP
[4]
PROGRESS IN ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF DYNAMIC STALL [J].
CARR, LW .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1988, 25 (01) :6-17
[5]
Cebeci T., 1974, ANAL TURBULENT BOUND
[6]
CHANDRASEKHARA MS, 1994, 75TH P AGARD FLUID D
[7]
DINDAR M, 1992, AIAA920027 PAP
[8]
EKATERINARIS JA, 1995, AIAA950781 PAP
[9]
EKATERINARIS JA, 1994, 75TH P AGARD FLUID D
[10]
FANT DB, 1992, P AFOSR WORKSHOP SUP