EPIDEMIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PHENOTYPICALLY DISTINCT NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS AMONG 0.7-MILLION CALIFORNIA BIRTHS, 1983-1987

被引:93
作者
SHAW, GM
JENSVOLD, NG
WASSERMAN, CR
LAMMER, EJ
机构
[1] STANFORD UNIV,DEPT PEDIAT,STANFORD,CA 94303
[2] STANFORD UNIV,PROGRAM MOLEC & GENET MED,STANFORD,CA 94303
关键词
D O I
10.1002/tera.1420490210
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Isolated neural tube defects (NTDs) appear to have different risk factors compared to nonisolated NTDs. To extend those observations, we explored routinely collected child and parental characteristics as possible risk factors among isolated versus nonisolated NTD cases, among high versus low spina bifida cases, and among open versus skin-covered spina bifida cases. Fetuses and liveborn infants with anencephaly or spina bifida among the 1983-87 cohort of births and fetal deaths (n = 712,863) were ascertained by the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, One hundred and ninety-three anencephalic cases and 272 spina bifida cases were compared to a random sample of 5,000 liveborn infants. Among anencephalic cases, 55% were livebirths and 85% were isolated. The proportion of males was similar to females across all subgroups. Increased risks were found for Hispanic whites, with risk estimates highest for nonisolated cases (odds ratio = 4.0, 95% confidence interval [1.5,10.5]). Among spina bifida cases, 92% were livebirths, 81% isolated, 82% open, and 86% were low. More males were found among the group with isolated high open defects, and fewer males were found among the group of all closed defects. The proportion of males was similar to females in all other subgroups. Cases were more likely to be Hispanic with risks largest for high open defects (odds ratio = 2.9, [1.2,6.6]), particularly for nonisolated cases. This study provides some evidence that further classifications of NTDs may reveal subgroupings of cases with different etiologies. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Brender J D, 1989, Tex Med, V85, P33
[2]   NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS - A REVIEW OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL STUDIES ON THE ETIOLOGY OF NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS [J].
CAMPBELL, LR ;
DAYTON, DH ;
SOHAL, GS .
TERATOLOGY, 1986, 34 (02) :171-187
[3]  
Chavez G F, 1988, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V37, P17
[4]  
Croen L A, 1991, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, V5, P423, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1991.tb00728.x
[5]  
Elwood J.M., 1992, EPIDEMIOLOGY CONTROL
[6]   THE PREVALENCE OF NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS AMONG ETHNIC-GROUPS IN BROOKLYN, NEW-YORK [J].
FELDMAN, JG ;
STEIN, SC ;
KLEIN, RJ ;
KOHL, S ;
CASEY, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1982, 35 (01) :53-60
[7]  
GREENE WB, 1991, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V33, P110
[8]  
HALL JG, 1988, AM J HUM GENET, V43, P827
[9]   ETIOLOGIC HETEROGENEITY OF NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS [J].
HOLMES, LB ;
DRISCOLL, SG ;
ATKINS, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 294 (07) :365-369
[10]   ETIOLOGIC HETEROGENEITY OF NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS - CLUES FROM EPIDEMIOLOGY [J].
KHOURY, MJ ;
ERICKSON, JD ;
JAMES, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 115 (04) :538-548