PREDICTORS OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE-1 DIABETIC-PATIENTS AFTER PARTICIPATION IN AN INTENSIFIED TREATMENT AND TEACHING PROGRAM

被引:82
作者
BOTT, U
JORGENS, V
GRUSSER, M
BENDER, R
MUHLHAUSER, I
BERGER, M
机构
[1] Department of Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Who-Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf
关键词
INSULIN THERAPY; DIABETES EDUCATION SMOKING HEALTH CARE; COPING; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; C-PEPTIDE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00287.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to identify predictors of long-term glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetic patients after participation in an intensified insulin treatment and teaching programme. The study population consisted of 697 Type 1 diabetic patients (mean age 26 +/- 7 (SD) years, duration of diabetes 8 +/- 7 years) who participated in the same structured intensified insulin treatment and teaching programme in 10 hospitals and who were re-examined after 1, 2, and 3 years. Multiple and logistic regression analyses were performed including a set of demographic, disease-related, social, and psychosocial variables as potential predictors. As dependent variables the average HbA1 values during the 3-year follow-up period and a composite variable (average HbA1 values/frequency of severe hypoglycaemia)-dividing patients into three groups with good, moderate or poor metabolic control-were considered. Regression analysis of average HbA1 values revealed significance (p < 0.05) for seven independent predictors in descending order: smoking, age at onset of diabetes, frequency of home blood glucose monitoring, socioeconomic status, diabetes-related knowledge, perceived coping abilities, and sex (R2 (percentage of variation explained by the model) = 17 %). In a second regression model, HbA1 values before the intervention programme were added to the model and achieved the highest standardized regression coefficient (0.38), increasing R2 to 29 %. In the logistic regression models considering both HbA, and severe hypoglycaemia as a composite dependent variable, diabetes-related knowledge, HbA, values before the intervention, smoking, perceived coping abilities, age at onset of diabetes, and C-peptide levels were the strongest predictors of glycaemic control. In conclusion, the relationship between demographic, disease-related, psychosocial, and social variables and metabolic control is complex. Therefore, simplistic concepts of linear causality should be abandoned. In addition to HbA, values before the intervention, smoking, diabetes-related knowledge, home blood glucose monitoring, age at onset of diabetes, perceived coping abilities and C-peptide levels were the most significant and consistent predictors of glycaemic control.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 371
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Muhlhauser I., Bruckner I., Berger M., Cheta D., Jorgens V., Ionescu-Tirgoviste C., Et al., Evaluation of an intensified insulin treatment and teaching programme as routine management of Type 1 (insulin‐dependent) diabetes, Diabetologia, 30, pp. 681-690, (1987)
[2]  
Jorgens V., Grusser M., Bott U., Muhlhauser I., Berger M., Effective and safe translation of intensified insulin therapy to general internal medicine departments, Diabetologia, 36, pp. 99-105, (1993)
[3]  
Harris R., Linn MW, Health beliefs, compliance, and control of diabetes mellitus, Southern Medical journal, 78, pp. 162-166, (1985)
[4]  
Lane JD, Stabler B., Ross SL, Morris MA, Litton JC, Surwit RS, Psychological predictors of glucose control in patients with IDDM, Diabetes Care, 11, pp. 798-800, (1988)
[5]  
Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Schafer LC, Self‐care behaviours and glycemic control in Type 1 diabetes, J Chron Dis, 40, pp. 399-412, (1987)
[6]  
Glasgow RE, Compliance to diabetes regimens. Conceptualization, complexity, and determinants, Patient Compliance in Medical Practice and Clinical Trials, pp. 209-224, (1991)
[7]  
Chantelau EA, Frenzen A., Gosseringer G., Hansen I., Berger M., Intensive insulin therapy justifies simplification of the diabetes diet: a prospective study in insulin‐dependent diabetics, Am J Clin Nutr, 45, pp. 958-962, (1987)
[8]  
Chantelau E., Relation of dietary barriers in patients with insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus to different modes of treatment, J Am Diet Assoc, 92, pp. 1129-1131, (1992)
[9]  
Wing RR, Lamparski DM, Zaslow S., Betschart J., Siminerio L., Becker D., Frequency and accuracy of self‐monitoring of blood glucose in children: relationship to glycemic control, Diabetes Care, 8, pp. 214-218, (1985)
[10]  
Worth R., Home PD, Johnston DG, Anderson J., Ashworth L., Burrin JM, Et al., Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin‐dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring: results of a controlled trial, Br Med J, 285, pp. 1233-1240, (1982)