PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE LARGE CELL OR IMMUNOBLASTIC NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMAS - EXPERIENCE OF THE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA PATHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION PROJECT

被引:14
作者
SIMON, R
DURRLEMAN, S
HOPPE, RT
BONADONNA, G
BLOOMFIELD, CD
RUDDERS, RA
CHESON, BD
BERARD, CW
机构
[1] NCI, DIV CANC TREATMENT, CANC THERAPY EVALUAT PROGRAM, BETHESDA, MD 20205 USA
[2] STANFORD UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL, STANFORD, CA 94305 USA
[3] INST NAZL STUDIO & CURA TUMORI, DIV MED ONCOL, MILAN, ITALY
[4] UNIV MINNESOTA, DIV MED ONCOL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
[5] NEW ENGLAND MED CTR, DIV HEMATOL ONCOL, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA
[6] ST JUDE CHILDRENS RES HOSP, DEPT PATHOL, MEMPHIS, TN 38101 USA
来源
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY | 1990年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
diffuse; immunoblastic; large cell; lymphoma; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1002/mpo.2950180202
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prognostic factors for long‐term survival of 312 patients with diffuse large cell or immunoblastic non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma are presented based on analysis of the multi‐institution clinicopathologic study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. At the time of analysis, 75% of the patients had died and the median follow‐up for patients still alive was 11 years. The distribution of Ann Arbor stages was 21% stage 1, 32% stage 11, 17% stage III, and 30% stage IV. Factors of prognostic significance for survival included age, stage, histologic subtype, presence of B symptoms, size of the largest lesion, number of extra‐lymphoid organs involved, and extent of lymphatic involvement. Recursive partitioning analysis suggested a prognostic classification system based on stage, age, size of the largest lesion, and presence of mediastinal involvement. Stage I patient <50 years of age had a 10 year survival rate of 65% compared to 36% for older stage I patients. Stage II patients <65 years old without bulky lesions or mediastinal involvement had a 10 year survival rate of 45% compared to 10% for the poorer risk stage II patients. Although statistically significant prognostic factors were identified for the stage III/IV patients, they were not strong discriminants of 5–10 year survival rate. Because of the correlation among potential prognostic factors, there is no uniquely best classification system. Reasons for discrepancies among reported prognostic factor analyses are discussed, and a prognostic grouping that synthesizes our results with those of others is proposed. Copyright © 1990 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE JO, 1982, CANCER, V50, P1695, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19821101)50:9<1695::AID-CNCR2820500907>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-H
[3]  
Breiman L, 2017, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, P368, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[4]  
CARBONE PP, 1971, CANCER RES, V31, P1860
[5]   WHY PREDICTIVE INDEXES PERFORM LESS WELL IN VALIDATION STUDIES - IS IT MAGIC OR METHODS [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
ALES, KL ;
SIMON, R ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (12) :2155-2161
[6]  
COIFFIER B, 1987, BLOOD, V70, P1394
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]  
DANIEU L, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P5372
[9]   EFFECT OF AGE ON THERAPEUTIC OUTCOME IN ADVANCED DIFFUSE HISTIOCYTIC LYMPHOMA - THE SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP EXPERIENCE [J].
DIXON, DO ;
NEILAN, B ;
JONES, SE ;
LIPSCHITZ, DA ;
MILLER, TP ;
GROZEA, PN ;
WILSON, HE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :295-305
[10]  
FISHER RI, 1987, SEMIN HEMATOL, V24, P21