COMPARISON OF A NEW SULFATE-FREE POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE SOLUTION VERSUS A STANDARD SOLUTION FOR COLONOSCOPY CLEANSING

被引:88
作者
DIPALMA, JA
MARSHALL, JB
机构
[1] WILFORD HALL USAF MED CTR,DIV GASTROENTEROL,LACKLAND AFB,TX 78236
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN GEN HOSP,DIV GASTROENTEROL,CLEVELAND,OH 44109
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(90)71025-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A new sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS) for colonoscopy was formulated to taste better and have less net water and electrolyte secretion and absorption than a standard polyethylene glycolelectrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS). At two centers, 157 patients were prospectively randomized to receive SF-ELS or PEG-ELS to assess adequacy of preparation, patient tolerance, weight changes, and various hematologic and biochemical parameters. Physician assessment of colon cleansing showed no difference between those patients receiving SF-ELS (N = 74) or PEG-ELS (N = 78). Eighty-two percent of all preps were found to be “clinically acceptable.” Subjects receiving SF-ELS had significantly less fullness and cramps, while PEG-ELS subjects reported less nausea. There was no difference between groups for vomiting, overall discomfort, or willingness to repeat the preparation received. Eighty percent of all patients would repeat the randomized cleansing methods. There were no clinically significant changes in weight or assessed laboratory parameters, with the exception of potassium where PEG-ELS patients had an mean decrease of 0.22 mEq/liter vs. 0.01 mEq/liter for SF-ELS (p ≤ 0.01). Patient taste questionnaires in those patients expressing a preference showed a preference for SF-ELS (76.6%) over PEG-ELS (23.4%) (p ≤ 0.001). Thirty-two (22.5%) of total respondents indicated no preference. We conclude that SF-ELS when compared with PEG-ELS is similarly a safe and effective method of colon cleansing for colonoscopy that is well tolerated. Patients prefer the taste of the new solution. © 1990, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 289
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   WHOLE GUT LAVAGE FOR COLONOSCOPY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 SOLUTIONS [J].
ADLER, M ;
QUENON, M ;
EVENADIN, D ;
JEANMART, J ;
VANGOSSUM, A ;
BOURGEOIS, N ;
CREMER, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1984, 30 (02) :65-67
[2]   A PHYSIOLOGICAL APPRAISAL OF POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL AND A BALANCED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AS BOWEL PREPARATION [J].
AMBROSE, NS ;
JOHNSON, M ;
BURDON, DW ;
KEIGHLEY, MRB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 70 (07) :428-430
[3]   COMPARISON OF ORAL LAVAGE METHODS FOR PREOPERATIVE COLONIC CLEANSING [J].
BECK, DE ;
FAZIO, VW ;
JAGELMAN, DG .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1986, 29 (11) :699-703
[4]   COMPARISON OF CLEANSING METHODS IN PREPARATION FOR COLONIC SURGERY [J].
BECK, DE ;
HARFORD, FJ ;
DIPALMA, JA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1985, 28 (07) :491-495
[5]  
BECK DE, 1988, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V94, P29
[6]   URINARY-EXCRETION OF POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL 3350 AND SULFATE AFTER GUT LAVAGE WITH A POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE SOLUTION [J].
BRADY, CE ;
DIPALMA, JA ;
MORAWSKI, SG ;
SANTAANA, CA ;
FORDTRAN, JS .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 90 (06) :1914-1918
[7]  
Cochran W.G, 1957, STAT METHODS, V6th ed
[8]   DOUBLE-CONTRAST EXAMINATION OF THE COLON AFTER PREPARATION WITH GOLYTELY (A BALANCED LAVAGE SOLUTION) [J].
DAVIS, GR ;
SMITH, HJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1983, 8 (02) :173-176
[9]  
DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
[10]  
DIPALMA JA, 1984, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V86, P856