COMPARING MATERIALS USED IN PHILOSOPHY AND POLITICAL-SCIENCE DISSERTATIONS - A TECHNICAL NOTE

被引:12
作者
BUCHANAN, AL [1 ]
HERUBEL, JPVM [1 ]
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,SOCIAL SCI & EDUC LIB,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
关键词
D O I
10.1300/J103v12n02_04
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Ten dissertations were examined to determine the differences in materials used by disciplines in the humanities and the social sciences. The target dissertations in philosophy and political science revealed that humanities dissertations tend to cite older materials than do political science dissertations. Materials cited in philosophy reflect dependance upon monographs while political science emphasizes journals and government documents. Surprisingly, dissertations are not a major contributor to the literature cited. It is suggested that examination of citation patterns in dissertations is a feasible tool for collection development.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Broadus R. N., 1977, ADV LIBRARIANSHIP, V7, P300
[2]  
BROADUS RN, 1976, INT SOC SCI J, V23, P236
[4]  
KOENIG MED, 1978, COLLECTION MANAGEMEN, V2, P247, DOI DOI 10.1300/J105V02N03_06
[5]  
LACEY AR, 1976, DICT PHILOS, P159
[6]  
NISONGER TE, 1983, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER, V27, P163
[7]  
Perrault A. H., 1983, COLLECTION MANAGEMEN, V5, P1
[8]  
ROBERTS GK, 1971, DICT POLITICAL ANAL, P164
[9]  
SMITH LC, 1981, LIBR TRENDS, V30, P83