PROPHYLACTIC ORAL ANTIBIOTICS FOR LOW-RISK DOG BITE WOUNDS

被引:34
作者
DIRE, DJ
HOGAN, DE
WALKER, JS
机构
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residency Program Damali Army Community Hospital, Fort Hood, TX
[2] Section of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Department of Surgery University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
关键词
DOG BITE; CANINE BITE; ANIMAL BITE; PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1097/00006565-199208000-00005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
The use of prophylactic antibiotics in the initial treatment of noninfected dog bite wounds is controversial. All patients with noninfected dog bite wounds who presented to our emergency department (ED) over a two-year period were considered for entry into a randomized prospective study. Patients were excluded from the study if they had any high-risk criteria for infection: puncture wounds, hand or foot wounds, wounds greater than 12 hours old, a history of immunocompromising disorders, or the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Patients in the antibiotic group (n = 89) were treated with local wound care and given either dicloxacillin, cephalexin, or erythromycin orally for seven days. Patients in the control group (n = 96) received local wound care only. All patients had their wounds irrigated with a 1% povidone-iodine solution and debrided and sutured if clinically indicated. All patients were subsequently reevaluated for clinical signs of wound infection. The groups were similar in age, sex, time of delay in seeking treatment, anatomic sites of wounds, depths and types of wounds, and number of wounds requiring suturing. The wound infection rates for the antibiotic and control groups were 1.1 and 5.1 %, respectively. This difference was not significant (P = 0.212). There were 36 wounds in the antibiotic group and 37 wounds in the control group that were full thickness. The infection rates for these wounds were 2.8 and 13.5%, respectively. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.132). This study suggests that prophylactic oral antibiotics in low-risk dog bite wounds are not indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
Zook E.G., Miller M., Van Beek A.L., Et al., Successful treatment protocol for canine fang injuries, J Trauma, 20, pp. 243-247, (1980)
[2]
Callaham M.L., Prophylactic antibiotics in common dog bite wounds: A controlled study, Ann Emerg Med, 9, pp. 410-414, (1980)
[3]
Schultz R.C., McMaster W.C., The treatment of dog bite injuries, especially those of the face, Plast Reconstr Surg, 49, pp. 494-500, (1972)
[4]
Schultz R.C., Facial Injuries, (1977)
[5]
Douglas L.G., Bite wounds, Am Fam Physician, 11, pp. 93-99, (1975)
[6]
Dire D.J., Quick G., Dog-bite wounds, Emerg, 2, pp. 38-46, (1986)
[7]
Goldstein E., Cintren D.M., Finegold S.M., Dog bite wound and infection: A prospective clinical study, Ann Emerg Med, 9, pp. 508-512, (1980)
[8]
Graham W.P., Calabretta A.M., Miller S.H., Dog bites, Am Fam Physician, 15, pp. 132-137, (1977)
[9]
Aghababian R.V., Conte J.E., Mammalian bite wounds, Ann Emerg Med, 9, pp. 79-83, (1980)
[10]
Boenning D.A., Fleisher G.R., Campos J.M., Dog bites in children: Epidemiology, microbiology, and penicillin prophylactic therapy, Am J Emerg Med, 1, pp. 17-21, (1983)