COMPARISON OF THE PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF METASTATIC LYMPH-NODES AND NODAL STAGE BASED ON THEIR LOCATION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC-CANCER

被引:95
作者
ICHIKURA, T
TOMIMATSU, S
OKUSA, Y
UEFUJI, K
TAMAKUMA, S
机构
[1] First Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa 359
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1894
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine which is the better prognostic determinant in gastric cancer: number of positive metastatic lymph nodes or current nodal stage. Patients and Methods: Seven hundred seventy-seven patients who underwent potentially curative resections for gastric cancer were divided into three groups according to the depth of invasion. The influence of the number of positive nodes on their survival rate was analyzed. A multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results: A decreased survival rate was associated with an increased number of positive nodes in all of the subjects and in each of the three groups. Patients with one to three positive nodes had as good a prognosis as those without nodal involvement when each of the three groups was analyzed separately. Using a multivariate analysis in the patients with four or more positive nodes, we found that the number of positive nodes was the most important prognostic determinant (P < .0001), followed by the depth of invasion (P < .02), and that the nodal stage was not significantly prognostic. Further multivariate analysis in the patients with one to three positive nodes showed that nodal stage and number of positive nodes were not significantly prognostic. Conclusion: The number of metastatic nodes should be adopted for classification of nodal stage in gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1894 / 1900
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] ABE S, 1990, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V100, P287
  • [2] A MULTIFACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF MELANOMA .3. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN MELANOMA PATIENTS WITH LYMPH-NODE METASTASES (STAGE-II)
    BALCH, CM
    SOONG, SJ
    MURAD, TM
    INGALLS, AL
    MADDOX, WA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1981, 193 (03) : 377 - 388
  • [3] GASTRIC CANCER - CONTEMPORARY ASPECTS
    CADY, B
    RAMSDEN, DA
    STEIN, A
    HAGGITT, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 133 (04) : 423 - 429
  • [4] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [5] SURGICAL ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN CANCER OF BREAST - RESULTS OF A DECADE OF COOPERATIVE INVESTIGATION
    FISHER, B
    RAVDIN, RG
    AUSMAN, RK
    SLACK, NH
    MOORE, GE
    NOER, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1968, 168 (03) : 337 - +
  • [6] FISHER B, 1983, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V52, P1551, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1551::AID-CNCR2820520902>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-3
  • [8] HARUYAMA K, 1981, J JPN SURG SOC, V82, P612
  • [9] Hermanek P, 1987, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, V4, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6]
  • [10] JAEHNE J, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P290