SINGLE PERTURBED BEAT VS STEADY-STATE BEATS FOR ASSESSING SYSTOLIC FUNCTION IN THE ISOLATED HEART

Single-beat and steady-state techniques for evaluating end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) and Frank-Starling mechanism (FSM) in the crystalloid-perfused isolated rabbit heart were compared. In the single-beat technique, a train of stable isovolumic beats was interrupted with a single perturbed beat that either ejected against various levels of imposed isobaric load (ESPVR protocol) or beat isovolumically against various levels of end-diastolic volume (V(ED); FSM protocol). In steady-state technique, sustained beating was established, isobarically, at each of various loads (ESPVR protocol) or, isovolumically, at each of various V(ED) values (FSM protocol). ESPVR from steady-state technique lay above and to the left of that from single-beat technique. Contractile state was not uniform within steady-state technique, whereas it was uniform within single-beat technique. In the FSM protocol, single-beat technique exhibited the following features relative to steady-state technique: 1) greater range of developed pressures, 2) steeper ascending limb and more sharply defined maxima, 3) higher maximal developed pressure (P(dmax)), and 4) greater volume at P(dmax)(V(max)). Again, a common contractile state existed within single-beat technique but not within steady-state technique. It was concluded that single-beat technique was preferable to steady-state technique for evaluating ESPVR and FSM because 1) single-beat technique required less time for obtaining data, 2) single-beat technique allowed identification of uncomplicated values of P(dmax) and V(max), and 3) single-beat technique provided a common contractile-state reference for all data, whereas steady-state technique did not.