OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF THE DEGENERATED SEGMENT ADJACENT TO A LUMBAR FUSION

被引:145
作者
WHITECLOUD, TS
DAVIS, JM
OLIVE, PM
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
关键词
SPINAL FUSION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; OPERATIVE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199403000-00007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Fourteen patients with a previous lumbosacral fusion underwent neural decompression and fusion of a degenerated adjacent motion segment. The most common level was L3-L4 and there was an average of 3.2 (range 1-7) previous lumbosacral surgical procedures. The average interval from the first fusion until operative intervention on the degenerated adjacent segment was 11.5 years (range 3-29 years). Five patients had an uninstrumented fusion, of which only one progressed to arthrodesis. Three of these five patients with pseudarthrosis after uninstrumented fusion-and the remaining nine patients-had fusions with instrumentation. Ten of twelve instrumented fusions progressed to solid arthrodesis. The pseudarthrosis rate of 80% was decreased to 17% with the use of supplemental instrumentation. There was a significant number of complications and poor results, especially in patients with advanced osteoporosis and those with a short interval between adjacent segment degeneration, respectively. Eleven of 14 patients reported some postoperative pain relief.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 536
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Brodsky A.E., Post-laminectomy and post-fusion stenosis of the lumbar spine, Clin Orthop, 115, pp. 130-139, (1976)
  • [2] Crock H.V., Observations on the management of failed spinal operations, J Bone Joint Surg, 58B, pp. 193-199, (1976)
  • [3] Depalma A.F., Rothman R.H., The nature of pseudarthro-sis, Clin Orthop, 59, pp. 113-118, (1968)
  • [4] Farfan H.F., Kirkaldy-Willis W.H., The present status of spinal fusion in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral joint disorders, Clin Orthop, 158, pp. 198-214, (1981)
  • [5] Finnegan W.J., Fenlin J.M., Marvel J.P., Nordini R.J., Roth-Man R.H., Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply operated back patient, J Bone Joint Surg, 61A, pp. 1077-1082, (1979)
  • [6] Frymoyer J.W., Hanley E., Howe J., Kuhlmann D., Matteri R., Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lum-bar disc disease A minimum ten-year follow-up, Spine, 3, pp. 1-6, (1978)
  • [7] Frymoyer J.W., Hanley E., Howe J., Kuhlmann D., Matteri R., A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and non-fusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc sur-gery, Spine, 4, pp. 435-440, (1979)
  • [8] Frymoyer J.W., Matteri R.E., Hanley E.N., Kuhlmann D., Howe J., Failed lumbar disc surgery requiring second opera-tion. A longer term follow-up study, Spine, 3, pp. 7-11, (1978)
  • [9] Frymoyer J.W., Selby D.K., Segmental instability-rationale for treatment, Spine, 10, pp. 280-285, (1985)
  • [10] Harris R.I., Wiley J.J., Acquired spondylolysis as a sequel to spine fusion, J Bone Joint Surg, 45A, pp. 1159-1170, (1963)