COMPARISON OF EXERTION REQUIRED TO PERFORM STANDARD AND ACTIVE COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION

被引：41

作者：

SHULTZ, JJ

MIANULLI, MJ

GISCH, TM

COFFEEN, PR

HAIDET, GC

LURIE, KG

机构：

[1] University of Minnesota Medical School, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, The Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, 420 Delaware St. SE

[2] The St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, Office of Emergency Medical Services, St. Paul, MN

来源：

RESUSCITATION | 1995年 / 29卷 / 01期

关键词：

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ACTIVE COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CPR; EXERTION; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;

D O I：

10.1016/0300-9572(94)00812-T

中图分类号：

R4 [临床医学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100602 ;

摘要：

Objective: Active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) utilizes a hand-held suction device with a pressure gauge that enables the operator to compress as well as actively decompress the chest. This new CPR method improves hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters when compared with standard CPR. ACD-CPR is easy to perform but may be more labor intensive, The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the work required to perform ACD and standard CPR. Methods: Cardiopulmonary testing was performed on six basic cardiac life support- and ACD-trained St. Paul, MN fire-fighter personnel during performance of 10 min each of ACD and standard CPR on a mannequin equipped with a compression gauge. The order of CPR techniques was determined randomly with >1 h between each study. Each CPR method was performed at 80 compressions/min (timed with a metronome), to a depth of 1.5-2 inches, and with a 50% duty cycle. Results: Baseline cardiopulmonary measurements were similar at rest prior to performance of both CPR methods. During standard and ACD-CPR, respectively, rate-pressure product was 18.2 +/- 3.0 vs, 23.8 +/- 1.7 (x 1000, P < 0.01); mean oxygen consumption 15.98 +/- 2.29 vs, 20.07 +/- 2.10 ml/kg/min or 4.6 +/- 0.7 vs, 5.7 +/- 0.6 METS (P < 0.01); carbon dioxide production 1115.7 +/- 110 vs. 1459,1 +/- 176 ml/min; respiratory exchange ratio 0.88 +/- 0.04 vs, 0.92 +/- 0.04 (P = NS); and minute ventilation 35.5 +/- 5.1 vs. 45.6 +/- 9.2 l/min (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Approximately 25% more work is required to perform ACD-CPR compared with standard CPR. Both methods require subanaerobic energy expenditure and can therefore be sustained for a sufficient length of time by most individuals to optimize resuscitation efforts. Due to the slightly higher work requirement, ACD-CPR may be more difficult to perform compared with standard CPR for long periods of time, particularly by individuals unaccustomed to the workload requirement of CPR, in general.

引用

页码：23 / 31

页数：9

共 14 条

[1]

Lurie, Lindo, Chin, CPR: the P stands for plumbers helper, J Am Med Assoc, 264, (1990)

[2]

Chang, Coffeen, Lurie, Shultz, Et al., Tissue perfusion during standard vs. active compression-decompression CPR in the dog, Chest, (1994)

[3]

Lindner, Pfenninger, Lurie, Et al., Effects of active compression-decompression resuscitation on myocardial and cerebral blood flow in pigs, Circulation, 88, pp. 1254-1263, (1993)

[4]

Cohen, Tucker, Redberg, Et al., Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a novel method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Am Heart J, 124, pp. 1145-1150, (1992)

[5]

Cohen, Tucker, Lurie, Et al., Active compression-decompression: a new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, J Am Med Assoc, 267, pp. 2916-2923, (1992)

[6]

Shultz, Coffeen, Sweeney, Et al., Evaluation of standard and active compression-decompression CPR in an acute human model of ventricular fibrillation, Circulation, 89, pp. 684-693, (1994)

[7]

Rivers, Boczar, Smithline, Et al., A comparison of mechanical, standard and active compression-decompression CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients [abstract], Circulation, 88, pp. I-193, (1993)

[8]

Cohen, Goldner, Maccaro, Et al., A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital, N Engl J Med, 329, pp. 1918-1921, (1993)

[9]

Tucker, Galli, Savitt, Et al., Active compression-decompression resuscitation: effect on resuscitation success after in-hospital cardiac arrest, J Am Coll Cardiol, 24, pp. 201-209, (1994)

[10]

Lurie, Shultz, Callaham, Et al., Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, J Am Med Assoc, 271, pp. 1405-1411, (1994)

← 1 2 →