SPINAL-CORD MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH NONIDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIES USING SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS

被引:22
作者
LODER, RT
THOMSON, GJ
LAMONT, RL
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI
[2] Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
关键词
SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS; SPINAL SURGERY; NONIDIOPATHIC DEFORMITIES;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199112000-00003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Seventy-nine somatosensory evoked potentials were intraoperatively recorded in 52 patients undergoing spinal surgery for nonidiopathic spinal deformities. There were 37 true-negative, 28 true-positive (a significant change in the somatosensory evoked potential related to the surgical process), and 14 false-positive (a significant change in the somatosensory evoked potential not related to a surgical event) readings. There were, however, no postoperative neurologic deficits with any of the true-positive readings and no false negatives. Spinal and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials gave few false-positive readings. True-positive somatosensory evoked potentials occurred in 44% of the patients with neuromuscular deformities, 17% with congenital deformities, 45% with Luque instrumentation, 22% with Harrington instrumentation, and none with fusion in situ. Fifty percent of the true positives occurred while the sublaminar wires were tightened. The predictive accuracy of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring in this patient population is not high, but the sensitivity to potentially harmful surgical events is high.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1364
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abel M.F., Mubarek S.J., Wenger D.R., Castello J., Hicks G.E., Brainstem evoked potentials for scoliosis surgery: A reliable method allowing use of halogenated anesthetics, J Pediatr Orthop, 10, pp. 208-213, (1990)
[2]  
Bradshaw K., Webb J.K., Fraser A.M., Clinical evaluation of spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery, Spine, 9, pp. 636-643, (1984)
[3]  
Engler G.L., Spielholz N.I., Bernhard W.N., Et al., Somatosensory evoked potentials during Harrington rod instrumentation for scoliosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 60A, pp. 528-532, (1978)
[4]  
Grundy B.L., Intraoperative monitoring of sensory-evoked potentials, Anesthesiology, 58, pp. 72-87, (1983)
[5]  
Hall J.E., Levine C.R., Sudhir K.G., Intraoperative awakening to monitor spinal cord function during Harrington instrumentation and spine fusion, J Bone Joint Surg, 60A, pp. 533-536, (1978)
[6]  
Johnston I., Happel L.T., Norris R., Et al., Delayed paraplegia complicating sublaminar segmental spinal instrumentation, J Bone Joint Surg, 68A, pp. 556-563, (1986)
[7]  
Lamont R.L., Wasson S.L., Green M.A., Spinal cord monitoring during spinal surgery using somatosensory evoked potentials, J Pediatr Orthop, 3, pp. 31-36, (1983)
[8]  
Lubicky J.P., Spadaro A., Yuan H.A., Fredrickson B.E., Henderson N., Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery, Spine, 14, pp. 790-798, (1989)
[9]  
Lueders H., Gurd A., Hahn J., Et al., A new technique for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function: Multichannel recordings of spinal cord and subcortical evoked potentials, Spine, 7, pp. 110-115, (1982)
[10]  
Macewen G.D., Bunnell W., Sriram K., Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis: A report of the Scoliosis Research Society, J Bone Joint Surg, 57A, pp. 404-408, (1975)