THE CAMBERWELL ASSESSMENT OF NEED - THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH SEVERE MENTAL-ILLNESS

被引:591
作者
PHELAN, M
SLADE, M
THORNICROFT, G
DUNN, G
HOLLOWAY, F
WYKES, T
STRATHDEE, G
LOFTUS, L
MCCRONE, P
HAYWARD, P
机构
[1] PRiSM, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, De Crespigny Park
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.167.5.589
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background. People with severe mental illness often have a complex mixture of clinical and social needs. The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) is a new instrument which has been designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of these needs. There are two versions of the instrument: the clinical version has been designed to be used by staff to plan patients' care; whereas the research version is primarily a mental health service evaluation tool. The CAN has been designed to assist local authorities to fulfil their statutory obligations under the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 to assess needs for community services. Method. A draft version of the instrument was designed by the authors. Modifications were made following comments from mental health experts and a patient survey. Patients (n = 49) and staff (n = 60) were then interviewed, using the amended version, to assess the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the instrument. Results. The mean number of needs identified per patient ranged from 7.55 to 8.64. Correlations of the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the total number of needs identified by staff were 0.99 and 0.78 respectively. The percentage of complete agreement on individual items ranged from 100-81.6% (inter-rater) and 100-58.1% (test-retest). Conclusions. The study suggests that the CAN is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the needs of people with severe mental illness. It is easily learnt by staff from a range of professional backgrounds, and a complete assessment took, on average, around 25 minutes.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 595
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Association Psychiatric Assocaition, 1994, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2]  
Bradshaw J., 1972, PROBLEMS PROGR MED C
[3]   PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MEASURING NEEDS IN THE LONG-TERM MENTALLY-ILL - THE MRC NEEDS FOR CARE ASSESSMENT [J].
BREWIN, CR ;
WING, JK ;
MANGEN, SP ;
BRUGHA, TS ;
MACCARTHY, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (04) :971-981
[4]   THE MRC NEEDS FOR CARE ASSESSMENT - PROGRESS AND CONTROVERSIES [J].
BREWIN, CR ;
WING, JK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1993, 23 (04) :837-841
[5]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[6]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .1. THE PROBLEMS OF 2 PARADOXES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
CICCHETTI, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :543-549
[7]  
GARDNER SB, 1991, BRIT MED J LONDON
[8]  
*GRAMM SOFTW, 1992, GRAMM 5 WIND VERS 1
[9]   CAN WE MEASURE NEED IN THE HOMELESS MENTALLY-ILL - USING THE MRC NEEDS FOR CARE ASSESSMENT IN HOSTELS FOR THE HOMELESS [J].
HOGG, LI ;
MARSHALL, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1992, 22 (04) :1027-1034
[10]  
HOLLOWAY F, 1994, PSYCHIAT B, V18, P321