AEROELASTIC EFFECTS OF SPOILER SURFACES ON A LOW-ASPECT-RATIO RECTANGULAR WING

被引:2
作者
COLE, SR
机构
[1] NASA Langley Research Center, Configuration Aeroelasticity Branch, Structural Dynamics Division, Hampton, VA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 1992年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
408 Structural Design - 422 Strength of Building Materials; Test Equipment and Methods - 651 Aerodynamics - 652 Aircraft and Avionics - 931 Classical Physics; Quantum Theory; Relativity;
D O I
10.2514/3.46244
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
An experimental research study to determine the effectiveness of spoiler surfaces in suppressing flutter onset for a low-aspect-ratio, rectangular wing has been conducted in the Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). The wing model used in this flutter test consisted of a rigid wing mounted to the wind-tunnel wall by a flexible, rectangular beam. The flexible beam was connected to the wing root and cantilever mounted to the wind-tunnel wall. The wing had a 1.5 aspect ratio based on wing semispan and a NACA 64A010 airfoil shape. The spoiler surfaces consisted of thin, rectangular aluminum plates that were vertically mounted to the wing surface. The spoiler surface geometry and location on the wing surface were varied to determine the effects of these parameters on the classical flutter of the wing model. Subsonically, the experiment showed that spoiler surfaces increased the flutter dynamic pressure with each successive increase in spoiler height or width. This subsonic increase in flutter dynamic pressure was approximately 15% for the maximum height spoiler configuration and for the maximum width spoiler configuration. At transonic Mach numbers, the flutter dynamic pressure conditions were increased even more substantially than at subsonic Mach numbers for some of the smaller spoiler surfaces. But for larger spoiler sizes (in terms of either height or width) the spoilers forced a torsional instability in the transonic regime that was highly Mach number dependent. This detrimental torsional instability was found at dynamic pressures well below the expected flutter conditions. Variations in the spanwise location of the spoiler surfaces on the wing showed little effect on flutter. Flutter analysis was conducted for the basic configuration (clean wing with all spoiler surface mass properties included). The analysis correlated well with the clean wing experimental flutter results.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 773
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Dublin C.L., Watson J.J., Ricketts R.H., Doggett R.V., Evaluation of Four Subcritical Response Methods for On-Line Predictions of Flutter Onset in Wind-Tunnel Tests, (1982)
[2]  
Ricketts R.H., Doggett R.V., Wind-Tunnel Experiments on Divergence of Forward-Swept Wings, (1980)
[3]  
Noll T.E., Perry B., Et al., Aeroservoelastic Wind Tunnel Investigations Using the Active Flexible Wing Model-Status and Recent Accomplishments, (1989)
[4]  
Mabey D.G., Ashill P.R., Welsh B.L., Aeroelastic Oscillations Caused by Transitional Boundary Layers and Their Attenuations, Journal of Aircraft, 24, 7, (1987)
[5]  
Cole S.R., Exploratory Flutter Test in a Cryogenic Wind Tunnel, (1985)
[6]  
Reed W.H., Aeroelasticity Matters: Some Reflections of Two Decades of Testing in the NASA Langley Research Tunnel, (1981)
[7]  
Cole S.R., Flutter of a Low-Aspect-Ratio Rectangular Wing, (1989)
[8]  
Doggett R.V., Some Effects of Aerodynamic Spoilers on Wing Flutter, (1989)
[9]  
Whetstone W.D., EISI-EAL Engineering Analysis Language Reference Manual, (1983)
[10]  
Desmarais R.N., Bennett R.M., User's Guide for a Modular Flutter Analysis Software System (FAST Version 1.0), (1978)