GENETIC-BASIS OF THE DIFFERENCE IN ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE EXPRESSION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA-SIMULANS

被引:26
作者
LAURIE, CC
HEATH, EM
JACOBSON, JW
THOMSON, MS
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham
[2] Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN 55447
[3] Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston
[4] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Grain Mktg. Research Laboratory, Manhattan, KS 66502
关键词
Gene regulation; Interspecific variation; Molecular evolution;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.87.24.9674
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species, Drosophila simulans, differ in expression of the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). Adult melanogaster flies that are homozygous for the Slow allozyme have approximately twice the level of ADH activity and crossreacting material as simulans adults. There is no corresponding difference in ADH mRNA, however, so this difference in ADH protein level is evidently due to a difference in the rate of translation of the two RNAs and/or to a difference in protein stability. Here we report an interspecific gene-transfer experiment, using P-element transformation, to determine whether this expression difference is due to genetic background differences between the species (trans-acting modifiers) or to cis-acting factors within the Adh gene. When the Adh genes from D. melanogaster and D. simulons are put into the same genetic background, there is no detectable difference in their level of expression. The level is relatively high in the melanogaster background and relatively low in the simulons background. Therefore, the interspecific difference in Adh expression is due entirely to trans-acting modifiers, in spite of the many sequence differences between the Adh genes of the two species, which include two amino acid substitutions. (.
引用
收藏
页码:9674 / 9678
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AQUADRO CF, 1986, GENETICS, V114, P1165
[2]   THE MESSENGER-RNA FOR ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER DIFFERS IN ITS 5' END IN DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES [J].
BENYAJATI, C ;
SPOEREL, N ;
HAYMERLE, H ;
ASHBURNER, M .
CELL, 1983, 33 (01) :125-133
[3]   CONSERVATION AND CHANGE IN THE DNA-SEQUENCES CODING FOR ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE IN SIBLING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA [J].
BODMER, M ;
ASHBURNER, M .
NATURE, 1984, 309 (5967) :425-430
[4]   TISSUE-SPECIFIC REGULATORY DIFFERENCES FOR THE ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE GENES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA ARE CONSERVED IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER TRANSFORMANTS [J].
BRENNAN, MD ;
WU, CY ;
BERRY, AJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1988, 85 (18) :6866-6869
[5]   COMPLEX DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION OF THE DROSOPHILA-AFFINIDISJUNCTA ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE GENE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
BRENNAN, MD ;
DICKINSON, WJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1988, 125 (01) :64-74
[6]  
COHN VH, 1988, MOL BIOL EVOL, V5, P154
[7]  
COTE B, 1986, GENETICS, V112, P769
[8]  
DAGGARD GE, 1981, GENETIC STUDIES DROS, P59
[9]  
DAVID J, 1974, Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, V115, P401
[10]   COMPARED TOXICITIES OF DIFFERENT ALCOHOLS FOR 2 DROSOPHILA SIBLING SPECIES - D-MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA-SIMULANS [J].
DAVID, J ;
BOCQUET, C .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY C-PHARMACOLOGY TOXICOLOGY & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1976, 54 (02) :71-74