A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COLOSTOMIES, LEAKS AND STRICTURES AFTER COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS

被引:86
作者
TUSON, JRD
EVERETT, WG
机构
[1] Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge
[2] ST. Helier Hospital, Carshalton, SM5 1AA, Surrey, Wrythe Lane
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00496150
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A review was undertaken of 360 patients undergoing elective left-sided colonic or rectal resections with primary anastomosis, under the care of one surgeon, over a nineteen year period. The incidence, aetiology and management of anastomotic leaks and strictures was studied and the role of proximal diverting colostomy considered. Perioperative mortality was 2.7%. The incidence of anastomotic leaks was 24.4%. Leaks were more common when anastomoses were low, were sutured or were constructed by trainees. Strictures developed in 5.8%. Local recurrence of tumour was the cause of 25% of these strictures. Anastomotic leakage was the principal cause of benign strictures; those developing in association with leaks were more likely to require surgical intervention. There was no evidence that delay in colostomy closure contributed to the development of benign anastomotic strictures. It was not possible to determine whether the presence of a colostomy affected the incidence of leaks but the local effects of such leaks were mitigated in patients with colostomies. Where a minor leak had occurred it was not necessary to wait for complete anastomotic healing before closing the colostomy. After major leaks, colostomy closure before complete healing was associated with further anastomotic problems in 16.0% of cases. © 1990 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 48
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Everett W.G., Friend P.J., Forty J., Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis, Br J Surg, 73, pp. 345-348, (1986)
[2]  
Blamey S.L., Lee P.W.R., A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses, Br J Surg, 69, pp. 19-22, (1982)
[3]  
Goligher J.C., Graham N.G., De Dombal F.T., Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid, Br J Surg, 57, pp. 109-118, (1970)
[4]  
Goligher J.C., Lee P.W.R., Lintott D.J., Experience with the russian Model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum, Sur Gynaecol Obstet, 148, pp. 517-524, (1979)
[5]  
Brennan S.S., Pickford I.R., Evans M., Pollock A.V., Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses — a controlled clinical trial, Br J Surg, 69, pp. 722-724, (1982)
[6]  
Goligher J.C., Lee P.W.R., Simpkins K.C., Lintott D.J., A controlled comparison of one- and two-layer techniques of suture for high and low colorectal anastomoses, Br J Surg, 64, pp. 609-614, (1977)
[7]  
McGinn F.P., Gartell P.C., Clifford P.C., Brunton F.J., Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomised trial, Br J Surg, 72, pp. 603-605, (1985)
[8]  
Goligher J.C., Morris C., McAdam W.A.F., de Dombal F.T., Johnston D., A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgery, Br J Surg, 57, pp. 817-822, (1970)
[9]  
Kirkegaard P., Christiansen J., Hjortrup A., Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument, Am J Surg, 140, pp. 312-314, (1980)
[10]  
Irvin T.T., Goligher J.C., Johnston D., A randomised prospective clinical trial of single-layer and two-layer inverting intestinal anastomoses, Br J Surg, 60, pp. 457-460, (1973)