RECURRENCE RATES OF TREATED BASAL-CELL CARCINOMAS .2. CURETTAGE-ELECTRODESICCATION

被引:149
作者
SILVERMAN, MK
KOPF, AW
GRIN, CM
BART, RS
LEVENSTEIN, MJ
机构
[1] NYU MED CTR,SKIN & CANC UNIT,ONCOL SECT,562 1ST AVE,NEW YORK,NY 10016
[2] NYU,SCH MED,DEPT DERMATOL,NEW YORK,NY 10003
来源
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY | 1991年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb03425.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This is the second article in a series that reviews the experience in the Skin and Cancer Unit, from 1955 through 1982, with the treatment of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). This report deals with 2314 previously untreated (primary) BCCs removed by curettage-electrodesiccation. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing lesion diameter (P < .001), high-risk anatomic sites (nose, paranasal, nasal-labial groove, ear, chin, mandibular, peri-oral, and peri-ocular areas) (P < .001), middle-risk anatomical sites (scalp, forehead, pre- and post-auricular, and malar areas) (P < .001), and time-span treated (1955 to 1963) (P = .012) were independent risk factors for high recurrence rates. The patient's age, sex, and lesion duration before treatment did not affect the recurrence rates. In order to best illustrate our current experience with BCCs, the last time-span (1973 to 1982) was examined in detail. For the low-risk sites (neck, trunk, and four extremities), BCCs of all diameters responded well to curettage-electrodesiccation with an overall 5-year recurrence rate of 3.3% (SE = 1.5%) determined by the modified life-table method. In the middle-risk sites BCCs less than 10 mm in diameter had a recurrence rate of 5.3% (SE = 2.7%). Finally, in the high-risk sites, lesions less than 6 mm in diameter had a recurrence rate of 4.5% (SE = 2.6%). Thus, BCCs less than 6 mm in diameter, regardless of anatomic site, as well as selected larger BCCs depending on their anatomic site, are effectively treated by currettage-electro-desiccation.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 726
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BAER R, 1964, 1963 1964 SERIES YRB, P7
[2]  
CUTLER S J, 1958, J Chronic Dis, V8, P699, DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7
[3]   FAILURE OF CURETTAGE AND ELECTRODESICCATION FOR REMOVAL OF BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
DAUBERMONT, PCS ;
BENNETT, RG .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1984, 120 (11) :1456-1460
[4]   MULTIVARIATE RISK SCORE FOR RECURRENCE OF CUTANEOUS BASAL-CELL CARCINOMAS [J].
DUBIN, N ;
KOPF, AW .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1983, 119 (05) :373-377
[5]  
FREEMAN RG, 1964, CANCER, V17, P535, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(196404)17:4<535::AID-CNCR2820170415>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-P
[7]   INFLUENCE OF EMBRYONAL FUSION LINES FOR RECURRENCE OF BASAL-CELL CARCINOMAS IN THE HEAD AND NECK [J].
GRANSTROM, G ;
ALDENBORG, F ;
JEPPSSON, PH .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1986, 95 (01) :76-82
[8]  
Inc S. P. S. S., 1988, SPSS X USERS GUIDE
[9]  
KALBFLEISCH JD, 1980, STATISTICAL ANAL FAI
[10]  
KOPF A W, 1979, Journal of Dermatology (Tokyo), V6, P267