AN ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFUSION OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS

被引:22
作者
HANDFIELD, RB
PAGELL, MD
机构
[1] The Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0925-5273(95)00026-K
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Flexibility is often lauded in management journals as a key to success in batch manufacturing industries. One means of achieving this form of competitive capability is through investment in a ''Flexible Manufacturing System'', defined as ''...an automated batch manufacturing system consisting of NC machines, linked by automated material handling devices, that perform the operations required to manufacture parts'' [41, p. 274]. Despite the many advantages and the potentially large market for such systems, widespread adoption of FMSs by American manufacturers has not occurred, while other forms of automation such as programmable robots have been adopted at a much faster rate. This study explains patterns of FMS adoption using a technological diffusion model developed by Rogers and Shoemaker (1971). The framework suggests that the manufacturers of FMS have ignored several dimensions of new product management critical to the diffusion of innovations. These dimensions include relative advantage, compatibility, product complexity, trialability, and observability. Given the economic justification procedures commonly applied to FMSs, successful diffusion will require major infrastructural changes in adopting organizations. Several managerial guidelines are suggested which may help FMS suppliers to improve the rate of adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 253
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abernathy, Utterback, Patterns of industrial innovation, Technol. Rev., 8, 7, pp. 41-47, (1978)
[2]  
A Competitive Assessment of the US Flexible Manufactur- ing Systems Industry, Office of Capital Goods and International Construction Sector Group, (1985)
[3]  
A Competitive Assessment of the US Robotics Industry, Capital Goods and International Construction Sector Group, (1987)
[4]  
Ayres, US competitiveness in manufacturing, Managerial and Dec. Econom., pp. 3-12, (1989)
[5]  
Ayres, Haywood, Merchang, Ranta, Warnecke, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2, pp. 131-150, (1992)
[6]  
Binswanger, Agricultural mechanization a comparative historical perspective, The World Bank Research Observer, 1, 1, (1986)
[7]  
Blumenthal, Dray, The automated factory: Vision and reality, Technol. Rev., 88, pp. 28-38, (1985)
[8]  
Browne, Dubois, Rathmill, Sethi, Stecke, Classification of flexible manufacturing systems, FMS Mag., 1, 2, pp. 114-117, (1984)
[9]  
Computerized Manufacturing automation: Employment, Education, and the Workplace Summary, (1984)
[10]  
Cainarca, Colombo, Mariotti, An evolutionary pattern of innovation diffusion: The case of flexible automation, Research Policy, 18, 2, pp. 59-86, (1989)