DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT PATTERNS

被引:12
作者
BROWN, JJ
BORRELLO, JA
RAZA, HS
BALFE, DM
BAER, AB
PILGRAM, TK
ATILLA, S
机构
[1] Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis
关键词
GADOLINIUM; LIVER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR) STUDIES; FUNCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(94)00063-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A retrospective study of 164 patients undergoing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed to assess hepatic parenchymal enhancement patterns and to correlate these patterns with hepatic function and disease. Rapid T-1-weighted images were acquired before and after gadolinium administration. Hepatic enhancement patterns were analyzed blindly by two observers. Medical records were reviewed to document known liver pathology and liver function test results. A total of 72% of patients had homogeneous enhancement of the liver parenchyma; 28% had heterogeneous enhancement. Of the latter group, 61% of patients had enhancement conforming to segmental or lobar boundaries, Patients with heterogeneous enhancement patterns were more likely to have abnormal liver function test results and hepatic morphological abnormalities on their MR examinations than patients with homogeneous enhancement patterns. Heterogeneous hepatic enhancement on dynamic MR images is associated with a higher likelihood of liver disease and biochemical evidence of hepatic dysfunction than homogeneous enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Mirowitz, Gutierrez, Lee, Brown, Heiken, Normal abdominal enhancement patterns with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, Radiology, 180, pp. 637-640, (1991)
[2]  
Hamed, Hamm, Ibrahim, Taupitz, Mahfouz, Dynamic MR imaging of the abdomen with gadopentetate dimeglumine: Normal enhancement patterns of the liver, spleen, stomach, and pancreas, AJR, 158, pp. 303-307, (1992)
[3]  
Itai, Moss, Goldberg, Transient hepatic attenuation difference of lobar or segmental distribution detected by dynamic computed tomography, Radiology, 144, pp. 835-839, (1982)
[4]  
Itai, Hachiya, Makita, Ohtomo, Kokubo, Yamauchi, Transient hepatic attenuation differences on dynamic computed tomography, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 11, pp. 461-465, (1987)
[5]  
Mirowitz, Lee, Gutierrez, Brown, Heiken, Eilenberg, Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver, Radiology, 179, pp. 371-376, (1991)
[6]  
Brown, Lee, Lee, Van Lom, Malchow, Focal hepatic lesions: Differentiation with MR imaging at 0.5 T, Radiology, 179, pp. 675-679, (1991)
[7]  
Edelman, Siegel, Singer, Dupuis, Longmaid, Dynamic MR imaging of the liver with Gd-DTPA: Initial clinical results, AJR, 153, pp. 1213-1219, (1989)
[8]  
Hamm, Fischer, Taupitz, Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 14, pp. 205-206, (1990)
[9]  
Semelka, Shoenut, Kroeker, Et al., Focal liver disease: Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T<sub>2</sub>-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T, Radiology, 184, pp. 687-694, (1992)
[10]  
Schmiedl, Colbel, Hess, Klose, Kurtz, Dynamic sequential MR imaging of focal liver lesions: Initial experience in 22 patients at 1.5 T, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 14, pp. 600-607, (1990)