MICROBIOTIC SOIL CRUSTS - A REVIEW OF THEIR ROLES IN SOIL AND ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN THE RANGELANDS OF AUSTRALIA

被引:450
作者
ELDRIDGE, DJ
GREENE, RSB
机构
[1] DEPT CONSERVAT & LAND MANAGEMENT, CONDOBOLIN, NSW 2877, AUSTRALIA
[2] CSIRO, DIV WILDLIFE & ECOL, LYNEHAM, ACT 2602, AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH | 1994年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
MICROBIOTIC CRUSTS; MICROBIOTA; CRYPTOGAMIC CRUSTS; SEMIARID RANGELAND; SOIL CRUSTS; MOSS; LICHEN; CYANOBACTERIA;
D O I
10.1071/SR9940389
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Microbiotic crusts are assemblages of non-vascular plants (mosses, liverworts, algae, lichens, fungi, bacteria and cyanobacteria) which form intimate associations with surface soils. They play a major role in infiltration processes through changes to soil physico-chemical properties, and through their influence on soil surface roughness. Whilst some research suggests that they may restrict infiltration, Australian experience is that they are generally associated with enhanced infiltration. Unlike physical soil crusts, microbiotic crusts stabilize the soil against water and wind erosion, increasing landscape stability, particularly in areas of low vascular plant cover. Microbiotic crusts are thus useful indicators of soil surface condition, and cyanobacteria in the crusts fix nitrogen which may be utilized by developing vascular plant seedlings. Little is known, however, about how they interact with vascular plants and soil invertebrates. Their role in rangeland ecosystems has received renewed attention over the past few years with an increasing interest in ecologically sustainable development of arid and semi-arid grazing systems. In this review we discuss the characteristics and distribution of microbiotic crusts in the rangelands of Australia, their roles in soil and ecological processes and the impacts of fire and grazing. Finally we propose a new system for classifying crusts into functional groups and identify areas requiring further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 415
页数:27
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Alexander R.W., 1990, VEG EROS PROCESS ENV, P536
[2]   RECOVERY OF CRYPTOGAMIC SOIL CRUSTS FROM GRAZING ON UTAH WINTER RANGES [J].
ANDERSON, DC ;
HARPER, KT ;
RUSHFORTH, SR .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1982, 35 (03) :355-359
[3]   DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PIOSPHERE IN ARID CHENOPOD SHRUBLAND GRAZED BY SHEEP .1. CHANGES TO THE SOIL SURFACE [J].
ANDREW, MH ;
LANGE, RT .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1986, 11 (04) :395-409
[4]   DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PIOSPHERE IN ARID CHENOPOD SHRUBLAND GRAZED BY SHEEP .2. CHANGES TO THE VEGETATION [J].
ANDREW, MH ;
LANGE, RT .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1986, 11 (04) :411-424
[5]   AGGREGATION OF SOIL PARTICLES BY ALGAE [J].
BAILEY, D ;
MAZURAK, AP ;
ROSOWSKI, JR .
JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1973, 9 (01) :99-101
[6]  
BEYMER RJ, 1991, ARID SOIL RES REHAB, V5, P187, DOI 10.1080/15324989109381279
[7]   FACTORS INFLUENCING INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT PRODUCTION OF SEMIARID RANGELANDS IN NEVADA [J].
BLACKBURN, WH .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1975, 11 (06) :929-937
[8]  
BOGUSIAK A, 1992, 7TH P BIENN C AUST R, P285
[9]  
BOND R. D., 1964, AUSTRALIAN J SOIL RES, V2, P111, DOI 10.1071/SR9640111
[10]   Algae as pioneers in plant succession and their importance in erosion control [J].
Booth, WE .
ECOLOGY, 1941, 22 (01) :38-46