HEPATIC DYNAMIC SEQUENTIAL CT - SECTION ENHANCEMENT PROFILES WITH A BOLUS OF IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENTS

被引:41
作者
NELSON, RC [1 ]
MOYERS, JH [1 ]
CHEZMAR, JL [1 ]
HOEL, MJ [1 ]
JONES, EC [1 ]
PETERSON, JE [1 ]
CORK, RD [1 ]
BERNARDINO, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; LIVER NEOPLASMS; CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987614
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The enhancement characteristics in different portions of the liver during dynamic sequential bolus computed tomography (CT) with iodinated contrast material (DSBCT) were prospectively evaluated in 75 patients by using iothalamate meglumine, iopamidol, and iohexol (25 patients received each agent). After baseline noncontrast CT was performed, DSBCT was performed with a 180-mL intravenous bolus administered at 2 mL/sec. Scanning was started 25 seconds after the bolus was initiated, by using a 3-second scan time and rapid cephalocaudal table incrementation, yielding contiguous 8-mm-thick sections at a rate of nine sections per minute. On postcontrast images, peak enhancement was 115% for iopamidol and 117% for iohexol, both of which were superior to iothalamate meglumine at 95% (P < .05). After peaking, enhancement then decreased for all three contrast agents, although the decline was more precipitous for iothalamate meglumine. Enhancement on the more caudal sections with both iopamidol and iohexol was superior to that with iothalamate meglumine (P < .05). The data suggest that the enhancement characteristics for the two nonionic agents may be more optimal for detection of focal hepatic lesions than the ionic agent.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 502
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES AND FATTY INFILTRATION DETECTED BY ENHANCED DYNAMIC CT
    ALPERN, MB
    LAWSON, TL
    FOLEY, WD
    PERLMAN, SJ
    REIF, LJ
    AREVALOS, E
    RIMM, AA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 158 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [2] COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-MEDIA INJECTION RATES AND VOLUMES FOR HEPATIC DYNAMIC INCREMENTED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    BERLAND, LL
    LEE, JY
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (12) : 918 - 922
  • [3] COMPARISON OF PRE-CONTRAST AND POST-CONTRAST CT IN HEPATIC MASSES
    BERLAND, LL
    LAWSON, TL
    FOLEY, WD
    MELROSE, BL
    CHINTAPALLI, KN
    TAYLOR, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 138 (05) : 853 - 858
  • [4] HYPERVASCULAR HEPATIC METASTASES - CT EVALUATION
    BRESSLER, EL
    ALPERN, MB
    GLAZER, GM
    FRANCIS, IR
    ENSMINGER, WD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (01) : 49 - 51
  • [5] CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN ABDOMINAL CT - BOLUS VS INFUSION
    BURGENER, FA
    HAMLIN, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1981, 137 (02) : 351 - 358
  • [6] CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUE FOR DYNAMIC HEPATIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNING
    FOLEY, WD
    BERLAND, LL
    LAWSON, TL
    SMITH, DF
    THORSEN, MK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1983, 147 (03) : 797 - 803
  • [7] DYNAMIC HEPATIC CT
    FOLEY, WD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) : 617 - 622
  • [8] CONTRAST AGENT ENHANCEMENT IN ABDOMINAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - IONIC VS NONIONIC AGENTS
    HALVORSEN, RA
    DUNNICK, NR
    THOMPSON, WM
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (05) : S239 - S243
  • [9] INGELFINGER JA, 1987, BIOSTATISTICS CLIN M, P105
  • [10] EXTRAVASCULAR CONTRAST MATERIAL - MAJOR COMPONENT OF CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT
    KORMANO, M
    DEAN, PB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1976, 121 (02) : 379 - 382