EFFECTS OF ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE SIZE AND VENTILATOR SETTINGS ON THE MECHANICS OF A TEST SYSTEM DURING INTERMITTENT FLOW VENTILATION

被引:14
作者
FARSTAD, T
BRATLID, D
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP OSLO,RIKSHOSP,DEPT PEDIAT RES,NEONATAL RES LAB,OSLO,NORWAY
[2] UNIV HOSP OSLO,RIKSHOSP,DEPT PEDIAT,NEONATAL RES LAB,OSLO,NORWAY
关键词
RESISTANCE; DYNAMIC COMPLIANCE; PEEP; PIP; TIDAL VOLUME; INSPIRATORY TIME;
D O I
10.1002/ppul.1950110104
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The effect of varying the size of standard neonatal endothracheal tubes on delivered tidal volumes (V(T)), resistance (R), dynamic compliance (C(dyn)), and resistive work of breathing (WOB) was measured in a test system during intermittent flow ventilation at different ventilator settings. The experiments were performed with a Sechrist infant ventilator connected to a Drager Test Lung via standard neonatal endotracheal tubes. R, inspiratory (R(i)), and expiratory resistance (R(e)) as well as WOB were significantly affected by endotracheal tube size. The calculated difference in R(e) between endotracheal tubes of 2.5 and 3.5 mm I.D. was 93 cm H2O/L/s (mean value for all studies). C(dyn) and V(T) were also affected by endotracheal tube size. However, although statistically significant differences were found in C(dyn) (mean, 0.584 mL/cm H2O and 0.567 mL/cm H2O) and V(T) (mean, 13.0 mL and 12.7 mL) for the tube sizes 3.5 mm and 2.5 mm I.D., respectively, the absolute numerical differences were small. Also, ventilator settings with respect to the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) - positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) difference had a significant influence on C(dyn) for both tube sizes. On the other hand, flow and inspiratory time adjustments had no significant effect on ventilatory parameters. Endotracheal tube size and ventilator settings should be considered when comparing the pulmonary function tests in intubated and non-intubated newborn infants.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF NEONATAL PULMONARY MECHANICS AND ENERGETICS - A 2-FACTOR LEAST MEAN-SQUARE ANALYSIS [J].
BHUTANI, VK ;
SIVIERI, EM ;
ABBASI, S ;
SHAFFER, TH .
PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1988, 4 (03) :150-158
[2]  
BHUTANI VK, 1988, NEONATAL PULMONARY F, P13
[3]  
BROWN E, 1971, ANESTH ANALG, V3, P355
[4]  
CAVE P, 1968, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V3, P588
[5]  
CUNNINGHAM MD, 1988, NEONATAL PULMONARY F, P47
[6]   EARLY PREDICTION OF CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE BY PULMONARY-FUNCTION TESTING [J].
GOLDMAN, SL ;
GERHARDT, T ;
SONNI, R ;
FELLER, R ;
HEHRE, D ;
TAPIA, JL ;
BANCALARI, E .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1983, 102 (04) :613-617
[7]  
POLGAR G, 1965, J PEDIATR, V4, P557
[8]   ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE AS A FACTOR IN MEASUREMENT OF RESPIRATORY MECHANICS [J].
SULLIVAN, M ;
PALIOTTA, J ;
SAKLAD, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 41 (04) :590-592
[9]  
WALL M, 1980, CRIT CARE MED, V1, P38
[10]   INVITRO VERSUS INVIVO COMPARISON OF ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE AIR-FLOW RESISTANCE [J].
WRIGHT, PE ;
MARINI, JJ ;
BERNARD, GR .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1989, 140 (01) :10-16