EFFECTS OF ARTERIAL AND VENOUS VOLUME INFUSION ON CORONARY PERFUSION PRESSURES DURING CANINE CPR

被引:30
作者
GENTILE, NT
MARTIN, GB
APPLETON, TJ
MOEGGENBERG, J
PARADIS, NA
NOWAK, RM
机构
[1] Hartford Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, CI, Hurtford
[2] Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Detroit, MI
关键词
CPR; CORONARY PERFUSION PRESSURE; INTRAARTERIAL INFUSION; INTRAVENOUS INFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/0300-9572(91)90064-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Intraarterial (IA) volume infusion has been reported to be more effective than intravenous (IV) infusion in treating cardiac arrest due to exsanguination. A rapid IA infusion was felt to raise intraaortic pressure and improve coronary perfusion pressure (CPP). The purpose of this study was to determine if IA or IV volume infusion could augment the effect of epinephrine on CPP during CPR in the canine model. Nineteen mongrel dogs with a mean weight of 26.3 +/- 4.2 kg were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. Thoracic aortic (Ao), right atrial (RA) and pulmonary artery catheters were placed for hemodynamic monitoring. Additional Ao and central venous catheters were placed for volume infusion. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and Thumper(TM) CPR was begun after 5 min (t = 5). At t = 10, all dogs received 45-mu-g/kg IV epinephrine. Six animals received epinephrine alone (EPI). Five dogs received EPI plus a 500 cc bolus of normal saline over 3 min intravenously (EPI/IV). Another group (n = 8) received EPI plus the same fluid bolus through the aortic catheter (EPI/IA). Resuscitation was attempted at t = 18 using a standard protocol. There was a significant increase in CPP over baseline in all groups. The changes in CPP from baseline induced by EPI, EPI/IV and EPI/IA were 20.6 +/- 3.7, 22.8 +/- 4.2 and 22.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively. Volume loading did not augment the effect of therapeutic EPI dosing. By increasing both preload and afterload, volume administration may in fact be detrimental during CPR.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 63
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Ditchey, Winkler, Rhodes, Relative lack of coronary blood flow during closedchest resuscitation in dogs, Circulation, 66, pp. 297-302, (1982)
[2]  
Niemann, Haynes, Garner, Et al., Postcountershock, pulseless rhythms: response to CPR, artificial cardiac pacing, and adrenergic agonists, Ann. Emerg. Med., 15, pp. 112-120, (1986)
[3]  
Ralston, Voorhees, Babbs, Intrapulmonary epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Improved regional blood flow and resuscitation in dogs, Ann. Emerg. Med., 13, pp. 79-86, (1984)
[4]  
Michael, Guerci, Koehler, Et al., Mechanisms by which epinephrine augments cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs, Circulation, 69, pp. 822-835, (1986)
[5]  
Paradis, Martin, Rivers, Et al., Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation, JAMA, 263, pp. 1106-1113, (1990)
[6]  
Babbs, New versus old theories of blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Crit. Care. Med., 8, pp. 191-195, (1990)
[7]  
Ditchey, Lindenfeld, Potential adverse effects of volume loading on perfusion of vital organs during closed-chest resuscitation, Circulation, 69, pp. 181-190, (1984)
[8]  
Negovsky, Shikunova, Gurvich, Et al., Arterial versus venous transfusion in cardiac arrest from exsanguination further studies in dogs, Anesth Analg, 51, pp. 251-257, (1972)
[9]  
Kirimli, Safar, Arterial versus venous transfusion in cardiac arrest from xsanguination, Anesth. Analg., 51, pp. 251-257, (1972)
[10]  
Kirimli, Kampschulte, Safar, Cardiac arrest from exsanguination in dogs, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 529, pp. 183-189, (1968)