OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT IN WATER-STRESSED GRAPEVINE LEAVES IN RELATION TO CARBON ASSIMILATION

被引:109
作者
RODRIGUES, ML
CHAVES, MM
WENDLER, R
DAVID, MM
QUICK, WP
LEEGOOD, RC
STITT, M
PEREIRA, JS
机构
[1] UNIV SHEFFIELD, DEPT ANIM & PLANT SCI, SHEFFIELD S10 2TN, S YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
[2] UNIV SHEFFIELD, ROBERT HILL INST, SHEFFIELD S10 2TN, S YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
[3] UNIV ALGARVE, P-8000 FARO, PORTUGAL
[4] UNIV BAYREUTH, LEHRSTUHL PFLANZENPHYSIOL, W-8580 BAYREUTH, GERMANY
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | 1993年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/PP9930309
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The response of grapevine plants to severe water deficit (predawn leaf water potential of - 1.13 MPa), imposed at a rate of about 0.16 MPa day-1 was studied in terms of leaf water relations characteristics, stomatal behaviour and gas exchange. Carbohydrate status of leaves was also analysed in order to assess the contribution of soluble sugars as osmotic solutes during drought. Pressure/volume analysis showed an active osmotic adjustment in water-stressed leaves, which decreased osmotic potential at full turgor by 0.45 MPa and the apoplastic water fraction showed a reduction of 19% as compared to the well-watered plants. Cell wall elasticity was not significantly affected by water stress, and turgor loss point in stressed leaves was reached at lower water potential and relative water content values than in the well-watered controls. Photosynthesis was markedly reduced in water-stressed plants. However, well-watered and water-stressed leaves had similar concentrations of glucose and fructose. The concentrations of sucrose and starch decreased in water-stressed leaves. This accounted for a marked decrease in the ratio of leaf dry weight to area in droughted plants. The changes in concentrations of soluble carbohydrates could not account for the difference in osmotic potential between water-stressed and well-watered leaves.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 321
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   OSMOREGULATION IN COTTON IN RESPONSE TO WATER-STRESS .1. ALTERATIONS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF CONDUCTANCE, TRANSLOCATION, AND ULTRASTRUCTURE [J].
ACKERSON, RC ;
HEBERT, RR .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 67 (03) :484-488
[2]  
ALLEWELDT G, 1982, VITIS, V21, P313
[3]  
BENSARI M, 1990, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V28, P113
[4]  
Chaves M, 1987, PLANT RESPONSE STRES, P279
[5]   GAS-EXCHANGE STUDIES IN 2 PORTUGUESE GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS [J].
CHAVES, MM ;
HARLEY, PC ;
TENHUNEN, JD ;
LANGE, OL .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1987, 70 (04) :639-647
[6]   SOME POSSIBLE SOURCES OF ERROR IN DETERMINING BULK ELASTIC-MODULI AND OTHER PARAMETERS FROM PRESSURE-VOLUME CURVES OF SHOOTS AND LEAVES [J].
CHEUNG, YNS ;
TYREE, MT ;
DAINTY, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1976, 54 (08) :758-765
[7]   WATER RELATIONS PARAMETERS ON SINGLE LEAVES OBTAINED IN A PRESSURE BOMB AND SOME ECOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS [J].
CHEUNG, YNS ;
TYREE, MT ;
DAINTY, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1975, 53 (13) :1342-1346
[8]   INFLUENCE OF DROUGHT ACCLIMATION AND CO2 ENRICHMENT ON OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT AND CHLOROPHYLL-A FLUORESCENCE OF SUNFLOWER DURING DROUGHT [J].
CONROY, JP ;
VIRGONA, JM ;
SMILLIE, RM ;
BARLOW, EW .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 86 (04) :1108-1115
[9]   WATER AND NUTRIENT SUPPLY REGIMES AND THE WATER RELATIONS OF JUVENILE LEAVES OF EUCALYPTUS-GLOBULUS [J].
CORREIA, MJ ;
TORRES, F ;
PEREIRA, JS .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 5 (04) :459-471
[10]  
DAVIES WJ, 1991, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V42, P55, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.000415