PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF INPATIENT VS OUTPATIENT BOWEL PREPARATION FOR ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY

被引:17
作者
FRAZEE, RC
ROBERTS, J
SYMMONDS, R
SNYDER, S
HENDRICKS, J
SMITH, R
机构
[1] MEM HOSP,SCOTT SHERWOOD & BRINKLEY FDN,TEMPLE,TX
[2] TEXAS A&M UNIV SYST,COLL MED,TEMPLE,TX
关键词
BOWEL PREPARATION; OUTPATIENT; COLORECTAL SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02051011
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A prospective, randomized trial of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery was performed in 100 consecutive patients. Bowel preparation was standardized for both groups and consisted of 4 liters of Colyte(R) (Reed & Carnrick, Piscataway, NJ) and oral neomycin and Flagyl(R) (G. D. Searle & Co., Skokie, IL) the day before surgery. Patients were randomized into four subcategories: ileocolostomy, colocolostomy, abdominal perineal resection, and other. Tap water enemas were administered on the morning of surgery to ensure an adequate mechanical preparation. Ninety-six percent of the inpatient group and 97 percent of the outpatient group were able to drink three-fourths or more of the oral lavage preparation (P = 0.789, Fisher's exact text). A mean of 2.26 tap water enemas was required to achieve clear returns for the inpatient group, compared with 2.28 tap water enemas for the outpatient group (P = 0.221, Fisher's exact test). The adequacy of the bowel preparation as graded by the primary surgeon was good (84 percent), fair (12 percent), and poor (4 percent) in the outpatient group (P = 0.673, Fisher's exact test). Wound infection developed in 4 percent of the inpatient group and 4 percent of the outpatient group (P = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). Anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess was seen in one patient in each group (P = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that outpatient bowel preparation is as effective as inpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery and offers the advantage of cost savings and shorter hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 226
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BARBER MS, 1979, SURGERY, V86, P23
[2]   VETERANS ADMINISTRATION COOPERATIVE STUDY ON BOWEL PREPARATION FOR ELECTIVE COLORECTAL OPERATIONS - IMPACT OF ORAL ANTIBIOTIC REGIMEN ON COLONIC FLORA, WOUND IRRIGATION CULTURES AND BACTERIOLOGY OF SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS [J].
BARTLETT, JG ;
CONDON, RE ;
GORBACH, SL ;
CLARKE, JS ;
NICHOLS, RL ;
OCHI, S .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1978, 188 (02) :249-254
[3]  
BOND JH, 1975, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V68, P1145
[4]   CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF WHOLE GUT LAVAGE AS A METHOD OF BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONIC OPERATIONS [J].
CHUNG, RS ;
GURLL, NJ ;
BERGLUND, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1979, 137 (01) :75-81
[5]   PREOPERATIVE ORAL ANTIBIOTICS REDUCE SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS OF COLON OPERATIONS - RESULTS OF PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
CLARKE, JS ;
CONDON, RE ;
BARTLETT, JG ;
GORBACH, SL ;
NICHOLS, RL ;
OCHI, S .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1977, 186 (03) :251-259
[6]  
CRAPP AR, 1975, LANCET, V2, P1239
[7]  
DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
[8]  
DIPALMA JA, 1986, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V81, P652
[9]   A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF WHOLE GUT LAVAGE FOR COLONOSCOPY [J].
GILMORE, IT ;
ELLIS, WR ;
BARRETT, GS ;
PENDOWER, JEH ;
PARKINS, RA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (06) :388-389
[10]  
HEWITT J, 1973, LANCET, V2, P337