HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS FOR QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION

被引：63

作者：

DUMANOIR, S

KALLIONIEMI, OP

LICHTER, P

PIPER, J

BENEDETTI, PA

CAROTHERS, AD

FANTES, JA

GARCIASAGREDO, JM

GERDES, T

GIOLLANT, M

HEMERY, B

ISOLA, J

MAAHR, J

MORRISON, H

PERRY, P

STARK, M

SUDAR, D

VANVLIET, LJ

VERWOERD, N

VROLIJK, J

机构：

[1] GERMAN CANC RES CTR,D-69120 HEIDELBERG,GERMANY

[2] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP,DEPT LAB MED,CANC GENET LAB,SF-33521 TAMPERE,FINLAND

[3] WESTERN GEN HOSP,MRC,HUMAN GENET UNIT,EDINBURGH EH4 2XU,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND

[4] CNR,IST BIOFIS,I-56127 PISA,ITALY

[5] HOSP RAMON Y CAJAL,DEPT MED GENET,E-28034 MADRID,SPAIN

[6] RIGSHOSP,CHROMOSOME LAB,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK

[7] CHR UNIV CLERMONT FERRAND,FAC MED,CYTOGENET LAB,F-63001 CLERMONT FERRAND,FRANCE

[8] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,LAWRENCE BERKELEY LAB,BERKELEY,CA 94720

[9] DELFT UNIV TECHNOL,DEPT APPL PHYS,PATTERN RECOGNIT GRP,2628 CJ DELFT,NETHERLANDS

[10] LEIDEN UNIV,DEPT CYTOCHEM & CYTOMETRY,LEIDEN,NETHERLANDS

来源：

CYTOMETRY | 1995年 / 19卷 / 01期

关键词：

BACKGROUND CORRECTION; CCD CAMERA; FILTERS; FLUOROCHROMES; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; INTENSITY NORMALIZATION; PIXEL SHIFT CORRECTION; REACTIVE COPY NUMBER KARYOTYPE;

D O I：

10.1002/cyto.990190103

中图分类号：

Q5 [生物化学];

学科分类号：

071010 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Recommendations are made for hardware and software capabilities that will permit a level of performance of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis on metaphase chromosomes that is comparable to the best current practice. Guidelines for interpreting the results of CGH analysis in terms of chromosomal gains or losses are also presented. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

引用

页码：4 / 9

页数：6

共 15 条

[1]

Castleman KR, Color compensation for digitized FISH images, Bioimaging, 1, pp. 159-165, (1993)

[2]

Harnden DG, Path FRC, Klinger HP, ISCN 1985. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, (1985)

[3]

Joos S, Scherthan H, Speicher MR, Schlegel J, Cremer T, Lichter P, Detection of amplified genomic sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe, Hum. Genet., 90, pp. 584-589, (1993)

[4]

Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman FM, Pinkel D, Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular analysis of solid tumors, Science, 258, pp. 818-821, (1992)

[5]

Kallioniemi O-P, Kallioniemi A, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman FM, Pinkel D, Comparative genomic hybridization: A rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors, Semin Cancer Biol, 4, pp. 41-46, (1993)

[6]

Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Piper J, Tanner M, Stokke T, Chen L, Smith HS, Pinkel D, Gray JW, Waldman FM, Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91, pp. 2156-2160, (1994)

[7]

Kallioniemi O-P, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D, Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors, Genes Chromosom Cancer, 10, pp. 231-243, (1994)

[8]

Lichter P, Bentz M, du Manoir S, Joos S, Comparative genomic hybridization, Human Chromosomes: Manual of Basic Techniques

[9]

Lundsteen C, Maahr J, Christensen B, Bryndorf T, Bentz M, Lichter P, Gerdes T, Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization, Cytometry, 19, pp. 42-50, (1995)

[10]

du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schrock E, Popp S, Doehner H, Kovacs G, Robert-Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T, Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization, Hum Genet, 90, pp. 590-610, (1993)

← 1 2 →