SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY OF INTERRADICULAR BONE-LESIONS

被引:12
作者
KULLENDORFF, B
GRONDAHL, K
ROHLIN, M
NILSSON, M
机构
[1] GOTHENBURG UNIV, DEPT ORAL RADIOL, S-41124 GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN
[2] MALMO GEN HOSP, DEPT PHYS, S-21401 MALMO, SWEDEN
关键词
APICAL PERIODONTITIS; DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY; SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3109/00016359209012771
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Subtraction and conventional radiography were evaluated for their diagnostic potential to assess interradicular bone lesions in the mandibular premolar region. Both conventional radiographs and subtraction images were interpreted by 10 observers. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) technique was used to compare the two techniques. The diagnostic validity was higher for the subtraction technique, both for lesions confined to cancellous bone and for lesions including the cortical bone, than for the conventional technique. For bone defects confined to cancellous bone the diagnostic accuracy was lower than those reported from periapical bone lesions irrespective of whether subtraction or conventional radiography was used. We conclude that subtraction radiography improves the detectability of bone lesions, shallow ones in particular. Lesions in the interradicular bone are more difficult to detect than those in the periapical bone.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE OF BONY LESIONS [J].
BENDER, IB .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1982, 8 (04) :161-170
[2]   ROENTGENOGRAPHIC AND DIRECT OBSERVATION OF EXPERIMENTAL LESIONS IN BONE .2 [J].
BENDER, IB ;
SELTZER, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1961, 62 (06) :708-&
[3]   ROENTGENOGRAPHIC AND DIRECT OBSERVATION OF EXPERIMENTAL LESIONS IN BONE .1. [J].
BENDER, IB ;
SELTZER, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1961, 62 (02) :152-&
[4]   VARIATIONS IN INTERPRETATION OF PERIAPICAL RADIOLUCENCIES [J].
DUINKERKE, ASH ;
VANDEPOEL, ACM ;
DEBOO, T ;
DOESBURG, WH .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1975, 40 (03) :414-422
[5]  
FARMAN AG, 1991, DENTOMAXILLOFAC RAD, V20, P179
[6]   A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF XERORADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL FILM FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF PERIAPICAL STRUCTURES [J].
GRATT, BM ;
WHITE, SC ;
LUCATORTO, FM ;
SAPP, JP ;
KAFFE, I .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1986, 12 (08) :346-351
[7]  
GRONDAHL K, 1984, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V11, P411
[8]   DETECTABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL MARGINAL BONE-LESIONS AS A FUNCTION OF LESION DEPTH - A COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE [J].
GRONDAHL, K ;
KULLENDORFF, B ;
STRID, KG ;
GRONDAHL, HG ;
HENRIKSON, CO .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1988, 15 (03) :156-162
[9]   EXAMINER AGREEMENT IN ESTIMATING CHANGES IN PERIODONTAL BONE FROM CONVENTIONAL AND SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHS [J].
GRONDAHL, K ;
GRONDAHL, HG ;
WENNSTROM, J ;
HEIJL, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1987, 14 (02) :74-79
[10]  
HENRIKSON C, 1967, ACTA RADIOL S, V269