EFFECTS OF SUMMER AND WINTER ANNUAL SCENTLESS CHAMOMILE (MATRICARIA-PERFORATA MERAT) INTERFERENCE ON SPRING WHEAT YIELD

被引:20
作者
DOUGLAS, DW
THOMAS, AG
PESCHKEN, DP
BOWES, GG
DERKSEN, DA
机构
[1] AGR CANADA,RES STN,REGINA S4P 3A2,SASKATCHEWAN,CANADA
[2] AGR CANADA,EXPTL FARM,INDIAN HEAD S0G 2K0,SASKATCHEWAN,CANADA
关键词
SCENTLESS CHAMOMILE; MATRICARIA-PERFORATA; YIELD LOSS; WEED COMPETITION; RECTANGULAR HYPERBOLA; SPRING WHEAT;
D O I
10.4141/cjps91-118
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The influence of summer and winter annual scentless chamomile (Matricaria perforata Merat) on the yield of spring wheat in Saskatchewan was determined. In experimental plots, spring wheat was seeded into barley stubble where summer and winter annual scentless chamomile had been established. A rectangular hyperbolic model was used to describe the relationship between wheat yield and the density of flowering scentless chamomile plants. Winter annuals caused more yield reduction than did summer annuals. Weather conditions appeared to have an influence on the effect of scentless chamomile on spring wheat yield. The same model was fitted to sample data from farmers' fields and showed yield losses similar to those on experimental plots. The rectangular hyperbolic model fitted the data best when high weed densities occurred. At densities more typical of those found in farm fields, the asymptotic yield loss parameter of the model was poorly estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 850
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Cousens, 1985, ASPECTS APPLIED BIOL, V10, P1
[2]   A SIMPLE-MODEL RELATING YIELD LOSS TO WEED DENSITY [J].
COUSENS, R .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1985, 107 (02) :239-252
[3]   EFFECTS OF SOIL TYPE ON CROP YIELD WEED DENSITY RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WINTER-WHEAT AND BROMUS-STERILIS [J].
FIRBANK, LG ;
COUSENS, R ;
MORTIMER, AM ;
SMITH, RGR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1990, 27 (01) :308-318
[4]  
Frankton C., 1987, AGR CANADA PUBL
[5]   EFFECTS OF VOLUNTEER WHEAT AND BARLEY ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF FLAX [J].
FRIESEN, L ;
MORRISON, IN ;
MARSHALL, G ;
ROTHER, W .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (04) :1115-1122
[6]  
GROH H, 1946, CANADIAN WEED SURVEY, P65
[7]  
HOAG BK, 1980, P N CENT WEED CONTR, V35, P86
[9]  
Kay Q. O. N, 1969, WATSONIA, V7, P130
[10]  
KESSLER D, 1989, ERDA3 AGR CAN INF SH