EFFECTS OF SPHERICAL AND ASTIGMATIC DEFOCUS ON ACUITY AND CONTRAST SENSITIVITY - A COMPARISON OF 3 CLINICAL CHARTS

被引:45
作者
BRADLEY, A
THOMAS, T
KALAHER, M
HOERRES, M
机构
[1] Department of Visual Sciences, School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
关键词
SNELLEN; PELLI-ROBSON; VISTECH; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; VISUAL ACUITY; DEFOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/00006324-199106000-00003
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Two contrast sensitivity charts (Vistech and Pelli-Robson) have become available to the eye care practitioner. Their value as clinical tools for the assessment of visual function may be enhanced because of either an insensitivity to the effects of optical focus or a hypersensitivity to defocus. We compared the sensitivity to defocus of these charts to the traditional Snellen chart by examining the effect of up to +/- 5.00 D of spherical and astigmatic defocus on performance with each chart. In order to simulate the two types of clinical examination scenarios, tests were performed both with and without mydriatic/cycloplegic agents. The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart was very resistant to the effects of all types of optical defocus. As predicted, the high spatial frequencies on the Vistech chart were sensitive to defocus. However, although contrast sensitivities for the low frequencies were affected less, optical defocus produced significant decreases in low frequency Vistech contrast sensitivity. In addition, the Vistech chart was very insensitive to axis 180 blurring lenses. There was no indication that either contrast sensitivity chart was more sensitive to defocus than the standard Snellen chart.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 426
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Perrigin J., Perrigin D., Grosvenor T., A comparison of clinical refractive data obtained by three examiners, Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 59, pp. 515-519, (1982)
[2]  
Peters H.B., The relationship between refractive error and visual acuity at three age levels, Am J Optom Arch am Acad Optom, 38, pp. 194-198, (1961)
[3]  
Hirsch M.J., Relation of visual acuity to myopia, Arch Ophthalmol, 34, pp. 418-421, (1945)
[4]  
Bradley A., Hook J., Haeseker J., A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity tests: Effect of uncorrected myopia, Ophthal Physiol Opt, (1991)
[5]  
Hess R.F., Woo G., Vision through cataracts, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 5, pp. 428-435, (1978)
[6]  
Essock E.A., Williams R.A., Enoch J.M., Raphael S., The effects of image degradation by cataract on vernier acuity, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Scl, 25, pp. 1043-1050, (1984)
[7]  
White J., Loshln D., Grating acuity overestimates Snellen acuity in patients with age-related maculopathy, Optom Vis Sci, 66, pp. 751-755, (1989)
[8]  
Tylta M.E., Buncic J.R., Optic nerve compression impairs low spatial frequency vision in man, Clin Vis Sci, 2, pp. 179-186, (1988)
[9]  
Zimmern R., Campbell F., Wilkinson I., Subtle disturbances of vision after optic neuritis elicited by studying contrast sensitivity, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat, 42, pp. 407-412, (1979)
[10]  
Ross J.E., Bron A.J., Clarke D.D., Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma, Br J Ophthalmol, 68, pp. 821-827, (1984)