UTILITY OF ANTICARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES FOR DIFFERENTIATING OVARIAN ADENOCARCINOMAS FROM GASTROINTESTINAL METASTASIS TO THE OVARY

被引:18
作者
PAVELIC, ZP
PAVELIC, L
PAVELIC, K
PEACOCK, JS
机构
[1] UNIV CINCINNATI,COLL MED,BARRET CTR CANC PREVENT TREATMENT & RES,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
[2] E Z EM INC,RES DEPT,WESTBURY,NY 11590
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0090-8258(91)90101-A
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The distinction between primary ovarian tumors and metastastic cancers to the ovary is frequently ambiguous. Recently, we reported that the D-14 monoclonal antibody (MAb), which is directed against a specific epitope of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), always reacts with colorectal adenocarcinomas and only rarely with neoplasms of nongastrointestinal origin [J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 116, 51-56 (1990)]. We report here an analysis of the reactivity of four different anti-CEA MAbs with formalin-fixed tissue sections of human primary and metastatic colorectal and ovarian carcinomas. The four monoclonal antibodies employed were D-14, CEJ065, ZCEA1, and SP-625. D-14, CEJ065, and SP-625 MAbs reacted with essentially every colorectal adenocarcinoma. In contrast, ZCEA1 was the least reactive and 10 tumor samples showed no reactivity to this MAb. All four anti-CEA MAbs demonstrated scarce immunoreactivity with ovarian carcinomas and appear to be useful for distinguishing between ovarian carcinoma and colorectal metastasis to the ovary. Adenocarcinomas of the stomach and breast were also examined to determine CEA reactivity with the D-14 MAb, since these tumors need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of an ovarian mass. The majority of stomach adenocarcinomas were immunoreactive. In contrast, only 3 of 36 breast carcinomas were weakly immunoreactive, indicating that D-14 MAb is of no assistance in identifying breast carcinoma metastasis to the ovary. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   THE VALUE OF TUMOR-MARKERS IN CANCER OF THE OVARY [J].
CANTAROW, WD ;
STOLBACH, LL ;
BHATTACHARYA, M ;
CHATTERJEE, SK ;
BARLOW, JJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1981, 7 (08) :1095-1098
[2]  
DISAIA PJ, 1977, CANCER, V39, P2365, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:6<2365::AID-CNCR2820390609>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-I
[4]   DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES [J].
GOLD, P ;
FREEDMAN, SO .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1965, 121 (03) :439-+
[5]  
GOLDENBERG D M, 1976, Gynecologic Oncology, V4, P204, DOI 10.1016/0090-8258(76)90062-7
[6]  
HAGGARTY A, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P300
[7]  
HAMMARSTROM S, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P4852
[8]   IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN IN EPITHELIAL TUMORS OF THE OVARY [J].
HEALD, J ;
BUCKLEY, CH ;
FOX, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1979, 32 (09) :918-926
[9]   CHALLENGE OF METASTATIC OVARIAN CARCINOMA [J].
ISRAEL, SL ;
HELSEL, EV ;
HAUSMAN, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1965, 93 (08) :1094-&
[10]  
MARCHAND A, 1975, CANCER RES, V35, P3807