CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY OF THE COPPER-T380A AND THE MULTILOAD-CU250 IUD IN 3 DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES

被引:22
作者
FARR, G
AMATYA, R
机构
[1] Clinical Trials Division, Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, 27709, North Carolina
[2] Biostatistics Division, Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, 27709, North Carolina
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01978107
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The clinical performance of the Copper T380A (TC380A) and the Multiload 250 (MLCu250) intrauterine devices (IUDs) were evaluated for 12 months in a group of women who had one of the two IUDs inserted. Results are from a randomized clinical trial conducted at four collaborating research sites located in three developing countries. The gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rate of the TC380A IUD was significantly lower than the rate with the MLCu250 IUD at 12 months (0.5 and 1.2, respectively, p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences between the two study IUDs were found with regard to TCJD expulsion or IUD removal due to bleeding/pain, personal reasons, medical reasons, or planned pregnancy. TCu380A IUD users were more likely to report experiencing increased dysmenorrhea (p<0.01) or intermenstrual pelvic pain (p<0.01) than were MLCu250 IUD users. However, few of these users discontinued use of their assigned IUD because of having experienced menstrual bleeding disturbances or intermenstrual pelvic pain. These data indicate that the TCu380A IUD may be a better option than the MLCu250 IUD for women wishing to practice highly effective long-term birth control without having to resort to hormonal methods.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 149
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Sivin I., Greenslade F., Schmidt F., Waldman S.N., The copper T380 intrauterine device: a summary of scientific data, (1993)
  • [2] Tatum H., Connell-Tatum E.B., Waldman S.N., Greenslade F.C., The new ParaGard Copper T380A intrauterine device, Med Digest., 9, pp. 1-5, (1989)
  • [3] Diaz J., Pinto, Diaz M., Marchi N.M., Bahamondes L., Long-term evaluation of the clinical performance of the TCu200B and the TCu380A in Campinas, Brazil, Adv. Contracept., 8, pp. 67-72, (1992)
  • [4] Sung S., Lian L.J., Liu X., Comparative clinical experience with three IUDs, TCu380Ag, TCu200C and Mahua ring in Tianjin, People's Republic of China, Contraception, 29, pp. 229-39, (1984)
  • [5] Diaz J., Diaz M.M., Pastene R., Araki A., Faundes A., Randomized clinical study of the TCu380A and the Lippes Loop C, in Campinas, Brazil, Contraception, 26, pp. 221-8, (1982)
  • [6] Sastrawinata S., Farr G., Prihadi H., Hutapea M., Anwar I., Wahyudi, Sunjoto K.P., Champion C.B., Robbins M., A comparative clinical trial of the TCu380A, Lippes Loop and Multiload Cu375 IUDs in Indonesia, Contraception., 44, pp. 141-54, (1991)
  • [7] Sivin I., Schmidt F., Effectiveness of IUDs: a review, Contraception., 36, pp. 55-84, (1987)
  • [8] Sivin I., Tatum H., Four years of experience with the TCu380A intrauterine contraceptive device, Fertil Steril., 36, pp. 159-63, (1981)
  • [9] The TCu380A, TCu220C, Multiload 250 and Nova-T IUDs at 3,5, and 7 years of use: results from three randomized multicentre trials, Contraception., 42, pp. 141-58, (1990)
  • [10] Chi, The Multiload IUD-a U.S. researcher's evaluation of European device, Contraception, 46, pp. 407-25, (1992)