TASK COMPLEXITY AND THE SPEED AND EFFICIENCY OF ELEMENTAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE NATURE OF INTELLECTUAL GIFTEDNESS

被引:33
作者
KRANZLER, JH
WHANG, PA
JENSEN, AR
机构
[1] AUBURN UNIV,AUBURN,AL 36849
[2] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,BERKELEY,CA 94720
关键词
D O I
10.1006/ceps.1994.1032
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the speed and efficiency of elemental processing among the intellectually gifted. Groups of gifted and nongifted junior high school students were compared on several elementary cognitive tasks (ECTs) with no symbolic content and different degrees of requisite processing complexity. After controlling for the potentially confounding effect of knowledge base on the ECTs, results of this study further substantiated the significant relationship between elemental processing, task complexity, and intellectual giftedness. Differences between the gifted and nongifted groups on the ECT parameters increased monotonically with task complexity. Moreover, despite the fact that the ECTs used in this study have no information content and require no higher-order or metaprocesses for successful task completion, discriminant function analyses including the various elemental processing speed and efficiency measures correctly classified approximately 80% of all subjects. Implications of these results for theory relating giftedness to the speed and efficiency of elemental cognitive processes are discussed. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 459
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
BADDELEY AD, 1972, PSYCHOL LEARNING MOT, V8
[2]   BRAIN EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND INTELLIGENCE - THE HENDRICKSON PARADIGM [J].
BARRETT, PT ;
EYSENCK, HJ .
INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 16 (3-4) :361-381
[3]  
BAUMEISTER AA, 1968, AM J MENT DEF, V72, P715
[4]  
BORKOWSKI JG, 1986, CONCEPTIONS GIFTEDNE
[5]  
BORKOWSKI JG, 1984, APPLICATIONS COGNITI
[6]   SOURCES OF HUMAN PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES - THE MINNESOTA STUDY OF TWINS REARED APART [J].
BOUCHARD, TJ ;
LYKKEN, DT ;
MCGUE, M ;
SEGAL, NL ;
TELLEGEN, A .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4978) :223-228
[7]  
BREWER N, 1987, COGNITION SPECIAL CH
[8]   NO DEMONSTRATION THAT G IS NOT UNITARY, BUT THERES MORE TO THE STORY - COMMENT [J].
CARROLL, JB .
INTELLIGENCE, 1991, 15 (04) :423-436
[9]  
CECI S, 1990, LEARNING DISABILITIE