IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS OF COTREL-DUBOUSSET INSTRUMENTATION TO THE SACRO-PELVIS - A CLINICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

被引:90
作者
CAMP, JF
CAUDLE, R
ASHMUN, RD
ROACH, J
机构
[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital, San Diego, NC
[2] Raleigh Orthopedic Clinic, Raleigh, NC
[3] Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, Dallas, TX
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199009000-00018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The authors reviewed the early complications in all patients fused to the sacro-pelvis using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation at the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital. Six-teen patients were studied with an average follow-up of 13 months. Three methods of sacro-pelvis fixation were evaluated: iliosacral screws, sacral screws, and a technique whereby the caudle ends of the Cotrel-Dubousset rods were fashioned and inserted into the posterior iliac crest using the Galveston technique. Seven of the 16 sets of sacral screws (44%) failed during and after surgery. Two of the 7 sets of iliosacral screws failed postopera- tively (28%). No failures occurred in the 8 sets of Cotrel- Dubousset rods placed with the Galveston technique. Seven of the nine medical complications observed (77%) occurred in the sacral screw group. Using calf spines, a biomechanical evaluation of each system was undertaken to determine strength of fixation. Each system was failed in flexion 3 times. The sacral screws were the weakest, pulling directly out of the sacrum at 40 N-M. Cotrel-Dubousset rods inserted with the Galveston technique were the strongest, experiencing rod deformities before flexion failure at 70 N-M. Iliosacral screws were of intermediate strength failing by rotation on the axis of the screws or pulling directly out of the ilium at 55 N-M. The authors conclude that using Cotrel-Dubousset rods inserted with the Galveston techniques was the strongest and safest method of sacro-pelvis fixation of the three tested. © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 941
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Allen B.L., Ferguson R.L., L-rod instrumentation for scoliosis in cerebral palsy, J Pediatr Orthop, 2, (1982)
[2]  
Bonnett C., Brown J.C., Perry J., Et al., Evolution of treatment of paralytic scoliosis at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, J Bone Joint Surg, 57A, (1975)
[3]  
Dubousset J., Graf H., Miladi L., Cotrel Y., Spinal and thoracic derotation with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation, Orthopedic Transactions, 10, (1986)
[4]  
Dubousset J., Guillaumat M., Cotrel Y., Correction and fusion to the sacrum of pelvic obliquity with CD instrumentation in children and adults, Scoliosis Research Society, Paper No, (1986)
[5]  
Ecker M.L., Betz R.R., Trent P.S., Et al., Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis, Spine, 13, (1988)
[6]  
Floman Y., Micheli L.J., Penny J.N., Riseborough E.J., Hall J.E., Combined anterior and posterior fusion in 73 spinally deformed patients: Indications, results, and complications, Clin Orthop, 164, (1982)
[7]  
Hall J.E., Mills M.B., Rand F.R., Positive and negative early experiences with CD instrumentation in the treatment of spinal deformity at an American center, Scoliosis Research Society, Paper No, (1986)
[8]  
Harrington P.R., The management of scoliosis by spine instrumentation, South Med J, 56, pp. 1367-1377, (1963)
[9]  
Lonstein J.E., Akbamia B.A., Operative treatment of spinal deformities in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation, J Bone Joint Surg, 65A, pp. 43-55, (1983)
[10]  
Luque E.R., Carduso A., Treatment of scoliosis without arthrodesis or external support, Ortho Trans, 1, (1977)