MANAGEMENT OF SMALL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS - EARLY SURGERY VS WATCHFUL WAITING

被引:106
作者
KATZ, DA
LITTENBERG, B
CRONENWETT, JL
机构
[1] DARTMOUTH COLL,HITCHCOCK MED CTR,DEPT MED,TECHNOL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM,HANOVER,NH 03756
[2] DARTMOUTH COLL,HITCHCOCK MED CTR,VASC SURG SECT,HANOVER,NH 03756
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1992年 / 268卷 / 19期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.268.19.2678
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To compare two clinical strategies for the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) less than 5 cm in diameter: early surgery (repair small AAAs when diagnosed) and watchful waiting (measure AAA size every 6 months and repair when the diameter reaches 5 cm). Data Sources.-We reviewed data from an earlier longitudinal study of patients with small AAAs to estimate incidence rates of rupture or acute expansion. Estimates for other parameters in the model were obtained by searching the medical literature (MEDLINE, 1966 to present). Data Synthesis.-We constructed a Markov decision tree to compare early surgery with watchful waiting in patients with asymptomatic AAAs less than 5 cm in diameter, with respect to long-term survival in quality-adjusted life years. The average annual rates of rupture or acute expansion for AAAs with a maximal transverse diameter of less than 4.0, 4.0 to 4.9, and at least 5.0 cm, are 0, 3.3, and 14.4 events per 100 patient-years of observation, respectively. At an average rupture rate of 3.3 events per 100 patient-years and an average operative risk for elective surgery (4.6%, 30-day mortality), our model predicts that early surgery improves survival in patients who present with a 4-cm AAA. The benefit of early surgery decreases with increased age at presentation. If the average rupture rate for AAAs less than 5 cm is assumed to be low (eg, 0.4 event per 100 patient-years), watchful waiting is favored, particularly as operative risk increases. The decision in this subgroup, however, is sensitive to possible future increases in operative risk. Conclusions.-In the majority of scenarios that we examined, early surgery is preferred to watchful waiting for patients with AAAs less than 5 cm in diameter. Watchful waiting is generally favored, however, for patients with a low risk of AAA rupture or acute expansion, including those patients who present with very small AAAs (eg, <4 cm). More accurate data concerning the rupture risk of AAAs less than 5 cm would improve clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:2678 / 2686
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] ABERNATHY CM, 1986, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V256, P597
  • [2] Amundsen S, 1989, Eur J Vasc Surg, V3, P405, DOI 10.1016/S0950-821X(89)80046-5
  • [3] BAIRD RJ, 1978, CAN MED ASSOC J, V118, P1229
  • [4] BALLARD DJ, 1990, ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANE, P1
  • [5] BECK JR, 1983, MED DECIS MAKING, V3, P411
  • [6] BERGQVIST D, 1990, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V156, P63
  • [7] Berne T V, 1969, Am Surg, V35, P36
  • [8] ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS - OUTCOME OF SELECTIVE MANAGEMENT BASED ON SIZE AND EXPANSION RATE
    BERNSTEIN, EF
    CHAN, EL
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 200 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [9] ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS - THE CHANGING NATURAL-HISTORY
    BICKERSTAFF, LK
    HOLLIER, LH
    VANPEENEN, HJ
    MELTON, LJ
    PAIROLERO, PC
    CHERRY, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1984, 1 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [10] RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - THE TACOMA EXPERIENCE
    BODILY, KC
    BUTTORFF, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 149 (05) : 580 - 582