THE REACTION BETWEEN PHOSPHATE AND DRY SOIL .1. THE EFFECT OF TIME, TEMPERATURE AND DRYNESS

被引:45
作者
BRAMLEY, RGV [1 ]
BARROW, NJ [1 ]
SHAW, TC [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, DIV ANIM PROD, WEMBLY, WA 6014, AUSTRALIA
来源
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE | 1992年 / 43卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00174.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Phosphate (P) was added to soil in solution. The soil was air-dried or freeze-dried and then incubated at a range of temperatures for periods of up to 110 d. The rate of the continuing reaction between the P and soil was measured using the null-point method, and by measuring the amount of desorption induced by filter paper impregnated with iron oxide (P(i) test). The reaction between soil and P continued in both air-dried and freeze-dried soil, albeit more slowly than in moist soil. Freezing the soil, whether moist or dry, virtually stopped the reaction. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the continuing reaction between P and soil involves a solid-state diffusive penetration of the soil particles by the sorbed P ions. They also indicate that the common practice of storing soil air-dry, even for short periods at low temperature, will not preserve the P status of the soil as at sampling. It was estimated that for a sample of soil which remained moist at 25-degrees-C for 100 d after the addition of 335 mug P g-1 soil, before being sampled and stored air-dry at 4-degrees-C for 16 years, the measured P(i) test value would be about 15 mug P g-1. This compares with 46 mug P g-1 which is the estimated P(i) test value measured on the same day as sampling. When samples cannot be analysed for P status immediately following sampling, they should be stored at the lowest convenient temperature, preferably below 0-degrees-C.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 758
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BARROW NJ, 1975, SOIL SCI, V119, P167, DOI 10.1097/00010694-197503000-00002
[2]   DIFFERENCES AMONGST A WIDE-RANGING COLLECTION OF SOILS IN THE RATE OF REACTION WITH PHOSPHATE [J].
BARROW, NJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (02) :215-224
[3]   A MECHANISTIC MODEL FOR DESCRIBING THE SORPTION AND DESORPTION OF PHOSPHATE BY SOIL [J].
BARROW, NJ .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1983, 34 (04) :733-750
[4]   A QUICK AND SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE TITRATION CURVE AND ESTIMATING THE LIME REQUIREMENT OF SOIL [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
COX, VC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1990, 28 (05) :685-694
[5]   SODIUM-BICARBONATE AS AN EXTRACTANT FOR SOIL PHOSPHATE .1. SEPARATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING AMOUNT OF PHOSPHATE DISPLACED FROM SOIL FROM THOSE AFFECTING SECONDARY ADSORPTION [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
SHAW, TC .
GEODERMA, 1976, 16 (02) :91-107
[6]   EFFECT OF DRYING SOIL ON THE MEASUREMENT OF PHOSPHATE ADSORPTION [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
SHAW, TC .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1980, 11 (04) :347-353
[7]  
BARROW NJ, 1974, SOIL SCI, V118, P82, DOI [10.1097/00010694-197408000-00004, 10.1097/00010694-197412000-00006]
[8]   DESCRIPTION OF DESORPTION OF PHOSPHATE FROM SOIL [J].
BARROW, NJ .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1979, 30 (02) :259-270
[9]  
BARROW NJ, 1989, ECOL STUD, V74, P18
[10]   STUDYING DRIED, STORED SOIL SAMPLES - SOME PITFALLS [J].
BARTLETT, R ;
JAMES, B .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (04) :721-724