A COMPARISON OF ADENOSINE AND VERAPAMIL FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING

被引:31
作者
MADSEN, CD [1 ]
POINTER, JE [1 ]
LYNCH, TG [1 ]
机构
[1] CITY & CTY SAN FRANCISCO DEPT PUBL HLTH,EMERGENCY MED SERV,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70179-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To compare the efficacy and base hospital physician use of adenosine with that of verapamil in the prehospital treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Design: A 12-month prospective chart review of adenosine administration and a 12-month retrospective chart review of verapamil administration. Setting: A single-tier advanced life support emergency medical service system. Participants: Prehospital adult patients presenting with narrow-complex SVT. Interventions: Field paramedics identified SVT. They then administered verapamil or adenosine under on-line physician medical control. Paramedics administered up to two IV doses of verapamil, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, or up to two IV doses of adenosine, 6 mg and 12 mg. They recorded ECG readings; blood pressure; pulse; respirations; and symptoms before, during, acid after drug administration. Results: During the verapamil period, paramedics identified 102 cases of SVT and administered verapamil to 17 patients. Review by a cardiologist revealed 6 of the 17 patients to have been in atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or sinus tachycardia. Of the remaining 11 patients, 7 (64%) converted from SVT to sinus rhythm. During the adenosine period, paramedics identified 89 cases of SVT, and they administered adenosine to 64 patients. Eight patients had no review because prehospital rhythm strips were lost. Of the remaining 56 patients, 24 were later determined to have been in atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, atrial flutter, or ventricular tachycardia. Of the remaining 32 patients who were in SVT, adenosine converted 25 (78%) to sinus rhythm. An important incidental finding was the misinterpretation of tachydysrhythmias in 30 of 73 patients by paramedics and base hospital physicians. Conclusion: Our study showed no difference in conversion rates between verapamil and adenosine. Base hospital physicians were more likely to order adenosine than verapamil. Paramedics and base hospital physicians often misinterpret tachydysrhythmias.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 655
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Di Marco, Miles, Aktar, Et al., Adenosine for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia Dose ranging and comparison to verapamil, Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, pp. 104-110, (1990)
[2]  
McCabe, Adhar, Menegazzi, Et al., Intravenous adenosine in the prehospital treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, Ann Emerg Med, 21, pp. 358-361, (1992)
[3]  
Mehta, Relative efficacy of various physical maneuvers in the termination of junctional tachycardia, Lancet, 1, pp. 1181-1185, (1988)
[4]  
Waxman, Vagal techniques for termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, Am J Cardiol, 46, pp. 655-657, (1980)
[5]  
Ornato, Treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in the emergency department by clinical decision analysis, Am J Emerg Med, 6, pp. 555-560, (1988)
[6]  
Singh, Calcium antagonists: Clinical use in the treatment of arrhythmias, Drugs, 25, pp. 125-153, (1983)
[7]  
Shaw, Prehospital use of intravenous verapamil, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 5, pp. 207-210, (1986)
[8]  
Weiss, The use of calcium with verapamil in the management of supraventricular tachycardias, Int J Cardiol, 4, pp. 275-280, (1983)
[9]  
Cushley, Inhaled adenosine and guanosine on airway resistance in normal and asthmatic subjects, British Journal of Pharmacology, 74, pp. 129-136, (1981)
[10]  
Cushley, Adenosine induced bronchoconstriction in asthma: Antagonism by inhaled theophylline, Am Rev Respir Dis, 15, pp. 380-384, (1984)