THE IMPACT OF SURPLUS SCHOOLING ON WORKER PRODUCTIVITY

被引:129
作者
TSANG, MC
RUMBERGER, RW
LEVIN, HM
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA,SANTA BARBARA,CA 93106
[2] STANFORD UNIV,STANFORD,CA 94305
来源
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | 1991年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-232X.1991.tb00786.x
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Human capital theory suggests that education enhances worker productivity and is reflected in higher individual earnings. We use data from the 1969 Survey of Working Conditions and the 1973 and 1977 Quality of Employment Surveys, and a model derived from the industrial psychology literature, to test the proposition that workers' education in excess of what their jobs require can have adverse effects on job satisfaction and other correlates of worker productivity. Our results support earlier studies that have found surplus schooling has a negative effect on job satisfaction. Our findings also indicate that the negative impact of surplus schooling on job satisfaction and turnover is more significant for workers with a higher level of surplus education. Finally, the negative effects of surplus schooling appear to change over time. Copyright © 1991, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 228
页数:20
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Becker G. S., 1975, HUMAN CAPITAL
[2]  
BERG I, 1970, ED JOBS GREAT TRAINI
[3]  
BISCONTI AS, 1977, JOB SATISFACTION COL
[4]   WHEN DOES UNION-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION WORK - A LOOK AT NUMMI AND GM-VAN-NUYS [J].
BROWN, C ;
REICH, M .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 31 (04) :26-44
[5]   THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF OVEREDUCATION [J].
BURRIS, V .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1983, 48 (04) :454-467
[6]  
DAVIS LE, 1972, DESIGN JOBS
[7]  
Denison E.F., 1979, ACCOUNTING SLOWER EC
[8]   EARNINGS FUNCTIONS AND NONPECUNIARY BENEFITS [J].
DUNCAN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1976, 11 (04) :462-483
[9]  
Duncan Greg, 1981, ECON EDUC REV, V1, P75, DOI 10.1016/0272-7757(81)90028-5
[10]   ECONOMIC CRITERIA FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING [J].
ECKAUS, RS .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1964, 46 (02) :181-190