ERROR MEASURES AND THE CHOICE OF A FORECAST METHOD

[1] HOW ACCURATE ARE THE UNITED-STATES BUREAU OF THE CENSUS PROJECTIONS OF TOTAL LIVE BIRTHS [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (04) : 365 - 374

[2] AHLBURG DA, 1987, HDB FORECASTING MANA, P135

[3] TESTS OF FORECAST ACCURACY AND BIAS FOR COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS - COMMENT [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (400) : 1004 - 1009

[4] KEILMAN NW, 1991, UNCERTAINTY NATIONAL

[5] METHODS FOR NATIONAL-POPULATION FORECASTS - A REVIEW [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 81 (396) : 888 - 901

[6] AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF LENGTH OF FORECAST HORIZON ON POPULATION FORECAST ERRORS [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 1991, 28 (02) : 261 - 274

[7] SMITH SK, 1987, J AM STAT ASSOC, V82, P991, DOI 10.2307/2289369

[1] HOW ACCURATE ARE THE UNITED-STATES BUREAU OF THE CENSUS PROJECTIONS OF TOTAL LIVE BIRTHS [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (04) : 365 - 374

[2] AHLBURG DA, 1987, HDB FORECASTING MANA, P135

[3] TESTS OF FORECAST ACCURACY AND BIAS FOR COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS - COMMENT [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (400) : 1004 - 1009

[4] KEILMAN NW, 1991, UNCERTAINTY NATIONAL

[5] METHODS FOR NATIONAL-POPULATION FORECASTS - A REVIEW [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 81 (396) : 888 - 901

[6] AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF LENGTH OF FORECAST HORIZON ON POPULATION FORECAST ERRORS [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 1991, 28 (02) : 261 - 274

[7] SMITH SK, 1987, J AM STAT ASSOC, V82, P991, DOI 10.2307/2289369