AUGMENTING AND REDUCING IN AVERAGED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES TO SINE WAVE LIGHT

被引:51
作者
SPILKER, B
CALLAWAY, E
机构
[1] Department of Pharmacology, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco
[2] California Department of Mental Hygiene, Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, San Francisco
关键词
Averaged evoked responses; Sensory responsiveness; Touch; Vision;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1969.tb02883.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been reported that the change in averaged visual evoked response (VER) amplitude with change in light flash intensity is related to a measure of kinesthetic figural after effects. It has also been reported that in some subjects, the amplitude of VER to sine wave light may decrease as depth of modulation approaches 100%. This study attempted to examine the change in VER amplitude resulting from change in depth of sine wave modulation on the one hand, and a measure of kinesthetic figural after effects (referred to as the bar test) on the other. The VER amplitudes to the six depths of modulation were plotted as a ftmction of depth of modulation, and the slope of that function served as an index of VER “augmentation” and “reduction.” The bar test was also scored to yield an index of kinesthetic “augmentation” and “reduction.” There was a rank correlation of .66 (p < .01 for N = 30) between VER slopes and bar test scores. Test‐retest values for eleven subjects show that VER slopes and bar scores changed together and that order of test day apparently had no regular effect. The administration of phenylephrine to dilate pupils produced a steeper VER slope, that is, a greater “augmentation,” in all six subjects tested. These results are discussed in terms of a general stimulus intensity control mechanism which influences sensory responsivity across modalities. Copyright © 1969, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:49 / &
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   STIMULUS INTENSITY CONTROL AND CORTICAL EVOKED RESPONSE [J].
BUCHSBAUM, M ;
SILVERMAN, J .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1968, 30 (01) :12-+
[2]  
KAMPHUISEN HA, 1968, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V24, P489
[3]  
PETRIE A, 1967, INDIVIDUALITY PAIN S
[4]   SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF AVERAGE STEADY-STATE AND TRANSIENT RESPONSES EVOKED BY MODULATED LIGHT [J].
REGAN, D .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1966, 20 (03) :238-&
[5]   HUMAN VISUAL RESPONSES TO SINUSOIDALLY MODULATED LIGHT [J].
VANDERTWEEL, LH ;
LUNEL, HFE .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1965, 18 (06) :587-+