EARLIEST ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT

被引:66
作者
ADAMS, J
TRENT, R
RAWLES, J
机构
[1] UNIV ABERDEEN, MED ASSESSMENT RES UNIT, ABERDEEN AB9 2ZD, SCOTLAND
[2] ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRM, DEPT CARDIAC, ABERDEEN AB9 2ZB, SCOTLAND
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 1993年 / 307卷 / 6901期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.307.6901.409
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives-To determine the incidence of the earliest electrocardiographic changes in patients with suspected myocardial infarction and their sensitivity and specificity for predicting the final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Design-Retrospective study of paired electrocardiograms recorded at home and on admission to hospital. Setting-29 rural practices in Grampian and teaching hospitals in Aberdeen. Patients-137 patients participating in the early anistreplase trial in the Grampian region, who received placebo at home and for whom paired electrocardiograms were available. Main outcome measures-Classified electrocardiographic abnormalities and diagnosis at discharge. Results-Electrocardiograms were recorded immediately before injection of placebo at home and anistreplase in hospital at median times of 110 and 240 minutes after the onset of symptoms. Definite or probable myocardial infarction was later confirmed in 93 (68%) patients. Of these, 66 (71%) had the same findings on both electrocardiograms of either ST elevation, bundle branch block, or a non-specific abnormality, while 27 (29%) showed a major change of classification between home and hospital recordings; 21 (23%) had ST elevation or bundle branch block on only one of the paired recordings. Although ST elevation was the commonest abnormality in the 93 patients with myocardial infarction, in only 51 was it recorded at home (sensitivity 55%) and in 49 on admission (sensitivity 53%). Of 57 patients with ST elevation at home, six did not have infarction (specificity 86%), while of 51 with ST elevation on admission, two did not have infarction (specificity 95%). Conclusions-Elevation of the ST segment is a transient electrocardiographic abnormality that has high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; it is an unsatisfactory precondition for giving thrombolytic treatment to patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 413
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, LANCET, V2, P349
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, LANCET, V1, P397
  • [3] EFFECTS OF CORONARY-ARTERY REPERFUSION ON MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE AND SURVIVAL IN CONSCIOUS DOGS
    BAUGHMAN, KL
    MAROKO, PR
    VATNER, SF
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1981, 63 (02) : 317 - 323
  • [4] TEMPORAL DEPENDENCE OF BENEFICIAL-EFFECTS OF CORONARY THROMBOLYSIS CHARACTERIZED BY POSITRON TOMOGRAPHY
    BERGMANN, SR
    LERCH, RA
    FOX, KAA
    LUDBROOK, PA
    WELCH, MJ
    TERPOGOSSIAN, MM
    SOBEL, BE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 73 (04) : 573 - 581
  • [5] USE OF THE INITIAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM TO PREDICT IN-HOSPITAL COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    BRUSH, JE
    BRAND, DA
    ACAMPORA, D
    CHALMER, B
    WACKERS, FJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (18) : 1137 - 1141
  • [6] CHAMBERLAIN DA, 1992, MED PUBLISHING F SER, V31, P17
  • [7] SPONTANEOUS COURSE OF ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION IN ACUTE ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    ESSEN, RV
    MERX, W
    EFFERT, S
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1979, 59 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [8] GATENBY R, 1992, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V305, P548
  • [9] PRECORDIAL ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION DURING ACUTE INFERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - CLINICAL, SCINTIGRAPHIC AND ANGIOGRAPHIC CORRELATIONS
    GIBSON, RS
    CRAMPTON, RS
    WATSON, DD
    TAYLOR, GJ
    CARABELLO, BA
    HOLT, ND
    BELLER, GA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1982, 66 (04) : 732 - 741
  • [10] NATURAL COURSE OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS AND STAGES IN THE 1ST 12 HOURS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    KLAINMAN, E
    SCLAROVSKY, S
    LEWIN, RF
    TOPAZ, O
    FARBSTEIN, H
    PINCHAS, A
    FOHORILES, L
    AGMON, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 1987, 20 (02) : 98 - 109